I am sure it has been discussed in the past but doesn't the sub-title "some dudes arguing" preclude a healthy feminine input to our bouts of invectives ?
Just tack on "Dudettes" and we might get as many as 10 times as many women participating who do now. Or even more multiples. With that one emendation, not even the sky is the limit.
Yeah: where are all the chicks? Oh, right: like the men, getting plump from Atlantic coast to Atlantic coast. Put some more mayo on those fries, fattie!
ReplyDeleteSounds like it's time we elect Jose Bove to office.
ReplyDeleteWomen? Yuck.
ReplyDeleteWhat we really need is someone who can channel Bettie Friedan. Yes, JJ?
ReplyDeleteI have had enough of Madeleine Albright.
ReplyDeleteyou've had madeleine albright ?
ReplyDeleteNot too bright of either of us. I was a dyed-in-the-wool Democrap then. Maddie was wasted on kamakazis. Like now.
ReplyDeleteJust tack on "Dudettes" and we might get as many as 10 times as many women participating who do now. Or even more multiples. With that one emendation, not even the sky is the limit.
ReplyDeleteBut, seriously, does Madeline Albright qualify as a woman?
ReplyDeletedoes Madeline Albright qualify as a woman?
ReplyDeleteOnly JJ knows.
I was pretty drunk at the time, but I didn't find any projections of force under that skirt.
ReplyDeleteI think I just threw up a little in my mouth.
ReplyDelete