Ok..... this is Putin's Russia, after all. How sure are we this was an accident? Fog...accident. The perfect efficiency of decapitating a proWestern polish government?....Need to see more on this.
Polish President used a 30-year Russian plane (?) which had recently been refurbished and certified by the Russians. Hmmm... Why not use a Boeing plane, or an Airbus? I read somewhere that the Poles used a Tupolev as a sign of goodwill towards the Russians. On the way to Katyn? Must be a curse.
Ok..... this is Putin's Russia, after all. How sure are we this was an accident?
ReplyDeleteFog...accident.
The perfect efficiency of decapitating a proWestern polish government?....Need to see more on this.
Polish President used a 30-year Russian plane (?) which had recently been refurbished and certified by the Russians. Hmmm... Why not use a Boeing plane, or an Airbus? I read somewhere that the Poles used a Tupolev as a sign of goodwill towards the Russians. On the way to Katyn? Must be a curse.
ReplyDeleteWhat a goddam mess.
ReplyDeleteIn Kirghiz Putin is getting just what he wants too.
We are jinxed.
ReplyDeleteTentatively, it looks like a pretty bad pilot error.
ReplyDeleteShoulda gone with a Boeing. Great instrumentation for blind landing. Dunna think the Tupolev had it.
ReplyDeleteOf course Tecs is still pulling for the EADS since they build boats for his buddy Putin.
ReplyDeleteAnything made by Boeing or Airbus is far superior to a Tupolev--a plane designed in the mid 1960s.
ReplyDeleteDon't get you-know-who started on that... you might end up in a discussion about Fomenko's New Chronology.
ReplyDeleteYou mean, who started the jet engine industry? I'll gladly enter into such a discussion, but it should be on another thread.
ReplyDeleteNo, I mean the guy that I worked with more than you did.
ReplyDeleteAre you trying to say Tsiolkovsky invented the rocket? No way. It was Oberth.
ReplyDeleteDon't you mean Popov?
ReplyDelete