The point of my label was that, a new axiom of Rotten Logik has developed: If McCarthy says A, Herr Rot deduces, ipso facto, that non A holds. A beaut.
Didn't think they allowed funny characters in labels. Besides, A => non A is only a particular instance of Rotter Logik. More generally, given any A and B, one may apply some kind of Rotten argument to show that A => B. It's a theorem in Tecsian Calculus.
Where's the "Planet Tecs Conflicted" label?
ReplyDeleteRight next to the "Seethe Rot Seethe" label?
ReplyDeleteThe point of my label was that, a new axiom of Rotten Logik has developed: If McCarthy says A, Herr Rot deduces, ipso facto, that non A holds. A beaut.
ReplyDeleteAnd you write that "A implies B"?
ReplyDeleteImpressive bit of cipherin there, Jethro.
You mean "A implies ¬A."
Didn't think they allowed funny characters in labels. Besides, A => non A is only a particular instance of Rotter Logik. More generally, given any A and B, one may apply some kind of Rotten argument to show that A => B. It's a theorem in Tecsian Calculus.
ReplyDeleteWow, I had been laying off the Mr Straman thing about "non A" thinking it was a typo.
ReplyDeleteTecs, is your francophilia showing? You like Kerry now, huh?
Non A: just 5,800,000 hits. How do you say "up yours" in French?
ReplyDelete