"Supposed to be"? What's that supposed to mean? You are making an assertion. Is that supposed to be an axiom (of Rotter Logick), or a theorem (in usual logic). If the latter, you need to supply a proof, not just wave hands, or mutter about \lesssims.
The lack of Cellphones ==> idiocy.
ReplyDeleteBut you're close. I mean you got A==> B when it was supposed to be ¬A==>B.
Take a VCP off your tab.
"Supposed to be"? What's that supposed to mean? You are making an assertion. Is that supposed to be an axiom (of Rotter Logick), or a theorem (in usual logic). If the latter, you need to supply a proof, not just wave hands, or mutter about \lesssims.
ReplyDeleteOn topic.
ReplyDeleteTecs and AA, you'd better not be condescending before doing some statistics on your classes...
ReplyDelete