Situation is analogous to Assange. Should maybe be illegal to abet the enemy whether it is by information or by morale.REGURGE: Rabinowitz contra Rot.
Thursday, April 07, 2011
Tecs' heartthrob joins moveon
Situation is analogous to Assange. Should maybe be illegal to abet the enemy whether it is by information or by morale.REGURGE: Rabinowitz contra Rot.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
12 comments:
We got in this to defeat our enemies, and we’re ending up defeating ourselves and the principles for which we once stood.
McCarthy is right. Petraeus' statement was disturbing.
Pastor Jones is aiding the enemy more than Assange is.
Perhaps yes, perhaps not -- how do you prove your conjecture? (It's not a theorem, by any means.)
In the meantime, I also noted (before you sent the McCarthy piece) that Petraeus completely abstained from mentioning (let alone condemning) the head-hackers who massacred those people in the UN compound. Sharia-compliant, eh?
His job is to win the war. He is not running for Newt Gingrich.
So how do you "win a war" by sucking up to the head-hackers? Me too stupido, no comprende.
Yeah, that's exactly it, Tecs. Capitulate to win.
Rotter Logick in full glory.
It is true that Capitulation guarantees a Win. The one annoying detail for the Rotter's thesis is that the one who wins ain't the one who capitulates.
Petraeus, in the end, is just another politico officer who is all about the method and nothing about the aim.
I really miss Schwarzkopf
the gate is closed.
The gates are burnt to the ground, and the Turk is pillaging the city.
Petraeus' point of view can be respectably criticized by that of a Dorothy Rabinowitz only in Tecsworld.
What does Michael Moore think?
Post a Comment