Wednesday, April 16, 2008

Versailles SHOULD be Very Ashamed


Yes, in the Salons they are so very ashamed of Brigitte. They once thought she was a proper royal courtesan, and now she speaks like some commoner who believes her stinking eyes over Vichy writ.

If ""destroying our country and imposing its acts" isn't a thought crime deserving the Bastille, what are the brilliant Green&Red minarets of Future Notre Dame for?

8 comments:

Pepe le Pew said...

AA - this sorry bimbo has been on an anti-muslim campaign ever since she married a member of Le Pen's FN.

Under the guise of objecting to the traditional killing of sheep for mechoui which "destroys our country", she is doing the FN's legwork by drumming up religious/racial hatred (she is far less vocal when it comes to cows).

Tecumseh said...

Oh, c'mon, Pepe, you sound so pedantic and mirthless. WTF did this old lady do to merit all this persecution and scorn of the bien-pensant pinko-Left? Yes, she lost a wire of two since her flamboyant youth (oh, was she gorgeous at her peak!), but being hounded by the PC Thought Police like this is disgraceful. And, BTW, do the French have the concept of free speech, or is it only admitted if it conforms 100% with the diktats of Planet Pepe?

Tecumseh said...

I checked your assertion about Bardot's husband (which evidently tries to impugn her motives by some kind of contrived guilt by association), and here is some background on her current hubby, Bernard d'Ormale:

How did the two meet? On June 7, 1992 d'Ormale attended a dinner party at St. Tropez, one Brigitte also attended, though in her usual style she had nearly begged off at the last minute. A coup de foudre ensued, followed by an unregistered marriage of August 16, 1992 at a country church in Norway, where they had been visiting her son.

D'Ormale at first seemed the perfect match, understanding Bardot's own sensitivity and atavistic peasant simplicity; but as usual for victims of impulsive love - especially those in the public fishbowl - Bardot soon ran into a media firestorm she hadn't anticipated. For just before meeting Bardot d'Ormale had decided in March of 1992 to work in the Nice office of National Front leader Jean-Marie Le Pen. He had helped in Le Pen's campaign, but would always maintain that he was never a member of the Front National.

Ah, but Planet Pepe will hound these people to their death, just because they dared to deviate from the PC dogma. Same old, same old.

Arelcao Akleos said...

Pepe, t'aint racial. Get over that farce once and for all. We aren't idiots in the salon of Versailles.
Second, so she is on an anti-Muslim campaign, so what? She is absolutely right about the intent, and increasing success, of IM on "imposing its acts" on France. And even if she wasn't, a country which yet purports to have a significant association with liberte' and all that jazz wouldn't be throwing her into jail for her beliefs. After all, those many Imams who are doing the imposing blare away openly at the mosques and in their journals, websites, etc..., with Frank impunity [pun intended].
But then what's the surprise? Vichy and freedom of thought and speech have always been mortal enemies.

Arelcao Akleos said...

Ah, here's the heart of it: "D'Ormale at first seemed the perfect match, understanding Bardot's own sensitivity and atavistic peasant simplicity"

Versailles found out Bardot was a peasant imposter behind that Bleu Blood finery. That's da Bastille for that Bitch, fo sho.

Tecumseh said...

Bardot=nazi bitch, Bush=Hitler, and on, and on, and on. Ah, the tedium of the Frenchy Left. They never graduate past kindergaten Marxism, and all its puerile invective. Blessed are les pauvres d'esprit.

Arelcao Akleos said...

Actually, les pauvres d'esprit are as Francis Assisi to the blighted and dessicated wastelands of the Pepan heartland.

Pepe le Pew said...

Bardot=nazi bitch, Bush=Hitler, and on, and on, and on. Ah, the tedium of the Frenchy Left.

On a board where social programs=nanny state and progressive thinking=pinko nonsense, I am using a rhetoric that has a chance to resonate. Surely it is the curse word you are objecting to, not the shallowness of the analogy.