Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Stumble #1

Posted by at
Labels:

7 comments:

Tecumseh said...

Typical pinko.

9/15/2010 7:44 PM
Tecumseh said...

Rush on Rove: I was saying to myself, "If he had just gotten this mad at Democrats during the Bush administration, why, who knows how things would be different today." Karl has admitted that one of his mistakes was not defending Bush against all these insane, stupid, slanderous, libelous attacks against Bush for eight years. But I've never heard Karl so animated against a Democrat as he was against Christine O'Donnell last night.

Good point. Also, I never saw Mac animated during the Fall 2008 campaign. But that's another story. Or is it?

9/16/2010 2:12 AM
Mr roT said...

Tecs, that fat retard would lose every race he managed. His criticisms of Rove are attention-getters for bloggers and their readers.

It is not at all clear that Rove is being sincere when he says that he should have gone ballistic on Dems when they started questioning W's honesty and so forth.

It is a given that when someone is lying about you, it is much better not to hit back. You never explain yourself to rebut a dishonest accusation because it dignifies the accusation.

W was able to do what he did because of Rove's political advice and with Rush's political advice, we'd've had President John F Kerry pulling us out of Iraq while the place was still on fire.

Getting mad at the Dems would only help the Dems.

The Dems right now are parading around pretending that their real problem is dishonest Rep characterizations of their achievements and rube Amerikkkans that buy it with a dash of racism mixed in.

They're losing, man, big time.

9/16/2010 11:54 AM
Tecumseh said...

Perhaps, perhaps. But let's not fall in the usual (mostly, but not exclusively) pinko fallacy that anyone who disagrees with oneself is, ipso facto, a big fat idiot. And Rushbo would not have made it in his business (and stayed big, for decades on end) if he was some random retard.

Now, perhaps, what you're saying is that his political analysis is flawed at times (or even many times, I'm not sure what your point is). But that's not equivalent to him being an idiot, is it?

9/16/2010 1:23 PM
Tecumseh said...

Ulululululu, says Rot.

9/16/2010 1:25 PM
Mr roT said...

Christine can make that kind of deficit up, perhaps. Not that I want her in the Senate; she sounded like more fun in school...

About Rush, like I said, he's in it for his show and he's stayed big all these years because he's good at doing that.

To put his opinion up against Rove's on a political matter is like AA's listening to my opinion on CDs over yours. It would simply be idiotic.

9/16/2010 5:46 PM
Tecumseh said...

Hmmm... You make politics sound like science, or something. It's not. So why is Rove's take any better or worse than ElRushbo's? We're not talking theorems or something here, just mere opinions.

9/16/2010 9:53 PM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)