freecounterpoint: Rot expresses reservations about parallel-parking prowess

Sunday, May 29, 2011

Rot expresses reservations about parallel-parking prowess

6 comments:

Mr roT said...: Define "parallel" without a differential equation, Tecs!; 5/29/2011 7:39 AM
Tecumseh said...: Look up Euclid's book.; 5/29/2011 7:47 AM
Arelcao Akleos said...: "Now Saudi men are planning to put a stop to the fight for women's rights by beating female drivers until they give up."

That's a downright Rotten argument.; 5/29/2011 8:49 AM
Mr roT said...: Does it work or is it like some \cd?; 5/29/2011 9:07 AM
Mr roT said...: PDE it is, says I, regardless of the high philosophin' here:

What we call a straight line in astronomy is simply the path of a ray of light. If, therefore, we were to discover negative parallaxes, or to prove that all parallaxes are higher than a certain limit, we should have a choice between two conclusions: we could give up Euclidean geometry, or modify the laws of optics, and suppose that light is not rigorously propagated in a straight line. It is needless to add that every one would look upon this solution as the more advantageous. - Nancy Poincaré; 5/29/2011 9:32 AM
Tecumseh said...: What does this have to do with beating up on parallel-parkers?; 5/29/2011 11:06 AM

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)