C'mon. Of course you're right that there is no logical correlation there, but there is a huge correlatioin between those socialist dickheads and shutting down the opposition by whatever means at their disposal, and keeping the opposition shut down. Just look at Pinochet! As soon as the country was in decent order he opened up enough opposition to indict him. Name a lefty that did that? Also, it's pretty clear that a guy that hugs Mugabe (he liked the 'land reform') is a damned dictator. Why didn't you see that before? Anti-American amour fou?
pinochet caved in to international pressure after modifying the constitution in an attempt to gain immunity, jj. this isn't a very good example of a selfless tyrant relinquishing power for the common good. Mugabe should hang by his tongue.
what's International Pressure doing for the Cubans? guaranteeing superior healthcare? Hah! Rightwingers in Brazil and Argentina and South Africa also have opened up to International Pressure. Whaer has it worked on leftist regimes?
So, Pepe, why is there genuine "international pressure" against Pinochet but only Yankee Oppression against your many fave Red Boyz Bunging?? As for "caving in", what do you mean? You mean that there was "int.press" to apoint Friedman as an economic advisor?? Oh, yeah, that's a good one. You mean that the UN was demanding that the freedom and democracy it so obviously trumpeted be establisfed??? That's an even better one You mean that you can't in all conscience get Vichy over a dictator who is without the "fuck 'em dead" cojones the lickspittle has come to love to lick? You choose to kneel down before the Red boyz if it can cause pain to Ricains, but you think once you've got your purdy Versaille lips lickin' down there Chavez way you can just stop and leave him all blue balled?? Think again, Vichy
6 comments:
how come you didn't put the customary "if he can stick to it" label on this, Pepe?
Are you changing heart? Past that amour fou phase, mon ami?
it's be great if chavez sticks to his opposition to the us admin's disastrous foreign policy, but that isn't the same as supporting censorship!
C'mon. Of course you're right that there is no logical correlation there, but there is a huge correlatioin between those socialist dickheads and shutting down the opposition by whatever means at their disposal, and keeping the opposition shut down.
Just look at Pinochet! As soon as the country was in decent order he opened up enough opposition to indict him.
Name a lefty that did that?
Also, it's pretty clear that a guy that hugs Mugabe (he liked the 'land reform') is a damned dictator.
Why didn't you see that before?
Anti-American amour fou?
pinochet caved in to international pressure after modifying the constitution in an attempt to gain immunity, jj. this isn't a very good example of a selfless tyrant relinquishing power for the common good.
Mugabe should hang by his tongue.
what's International Pressure doing for the Cubans? guaranteeing superior healthcare? Hah!
Rightwingers in Brazil and Argentina and South Africa also have opened up to International Pressure.
Whaer has it worked on leftist regimes?
So, Pepe, why is there genuine "international pressure" against Pinochet but only Yankee Oppression against your many fave Red Boyz Bunging??
As for "caving in", what do you mean?
You mean that there was "int.press" to apoint Friedman as an economic advisor?? Oh, yeah, that's a good one.
You mean that the UN was demanding that the freedom and democracy it so obviously trumpeted be establisfed??? That's an even better one
You mean that you can't in all conscience get Vichy over a dictator who is without the "fuck 'em dead" cojones the lickspittle has come to love to lick?
You choose to kneel down before the Red boyz if it can cause pain to Ricains, but you think once you've got your purdy Versaille lips lickin' down there Chavez way you can just stop and leave him all blue balled?? Think again, Vichy
Post a Comment