Saturday, September 20, 2008
Article 5
...of NATO says: The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all. Hey, JJ, is this clear enough for you, or is it like your reading of Article 3, Section 3 of the US Constitution -- something there on an old piece of paper, never to be enforced?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
4 comments:
A reader's comment: Keep this in mind-- (They) Ashkenazism THEN,why did zionist Germany attack Russia twice and millions died in WWI WWII NOW, They are at it again,planning,instagating WWIII
george archers, toronto, canada
Aahhh, Canuckia! Pepe would feel right at home.
I am confused, AI. Why are you attacking me over NATO? I agree that it should be a real alliance. I also think that the French and Germans don't have any idea what that means. I posted something lately about what a bunch of poofters those allies of our are.
This Torontan is out of his mind, right? WWII Germany was zionist? Where's Israel, then? Auschwitz?
I was not attacking you directly -- just trying to see if you are consistent, and think of NATO's charter the same way you think of the "aid and comfort" clause of the Constitution. Glad to see you don't -- though you should now also reconsider what Article 3, Section 3 says.
As for the Toronto guy -- he does sound like Pepe when he visits the crystal meth capital of Alaska.
Nah, the Toronto guy sounds exactly like you'd expect from a Torontan who wears proudly his Red Patch Boy badge.
Post a Comment