Haven't been arguing the non-scamitude of higher education for years?
Did you not try arguing more than once that the TA in \CD with the killer T&A was indispensable to the Uni's mission as a hand-out shop to abstract nonsensers?
"Non-scamitude"? Whoaa! Man, you're making up words, now.
As for abstract nonsense, at least that deals with (correct) logical implications, and true equalities (such as, "the diagram commutes on the nose"). How can namby-pamby approximations and assorted lesssims compete with Kantian pure logic? No they can't.
3 comments:
Tecs, this is all your tab, man, and you know it.
Haven't been arguing the non-scamitude of higher education for years?
Did you not try arguing more than once that the TA in \CD with the killer T&A was indispensable to the Uni's mission as a hand-out shop to abstract nonsensers?
Time for you to pay, Tecs.
"Non-scamitude"? Whoaa! Man, you're making up words, now.
As for abstract nonsense, at least that deals with (correct) logical implications, and true equalities (such as, "the diagram commutes on the nose"). How can namby-pamby approximations and assorted lesssims compete with Kantian pure logic? No they can't.
Tecs now dresses his blather in name-dropping. but it's a reasonable tactic. Maybe you can lean on Newt's or Eft's opinion.
I always cite the Annals in this situ, Tecs.
Rubes are dazzled.
Post a Comment