Saturday, May 30, 2009
Sublime Pepean logic hard at work
To drive home her point, Judge Sotomayor triumphantly cited Bartlett's performance during a courtroom demonstration of her reading skills. "Plaintiff read haltingly and laboriously, whispering and sounding out some words more than once under her breath before she spoke them aloud," the judge recalled. "She made one word identification error, reading the word 'indicted' as 'indicated.'" Aha! That's worth a lifetime tenure with all the perks on Planet Pepe.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
5 comments:
"At its core," Cabranes wrote, "this case presents a straightforward question: May a municipal employer disregard the results of a qualifying examination, which was carefully constructed to ensure race-neutrality, on the ground that the results of that examination yielded too many qualified applicants of one race and not enough of another?"
Pissing up a rope, big time. C'mon, José, wake up. This is America. That is, 2009 America.
More Pepean logic: “It is easy to understand the idea of viewing an individual on the content of their character rather than the color of their skin,” Ms. Guinier said, but race also is a social phenomenon of politics, history and economics that demand deliberate policy responses. How does this translate into plain English?
It translates: "It's obvious that the Just, as well as Moral, stance is to judge a man or woman by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin. But fuck this Just and Moral crap, komrads, it's just so much fun to play the Barbarian and piss on the World as we make it unjust and immoral."
It's as close to speaking the truth the gerbils of PP can force themselves to.
The goodie-pinkie mask is coming off, eh?
the notion that pepean logic is sublime is finally sinking in.
Post a Comment