Planet Pepe's proud of its playing Commodus [until the AIDS moon rose], and proud of its "just this wee bit short of wholehearted" embrace of the vicious ideology of Islam Militant. So it must be doubly proud at seeing such Honourable fruit born of that embrace. [This requires a pic -- AI]
Posts
11 comments:
The laughter of the damned. Planet Pepe as viewed by Hieronymus Bosch.
Yes, it does require a pic. Neat touch, AI. I've got to get into the pic'in game
That's right: the torture and murder of adulterous women is one of those secret tenets of liberal philosophy that I whole-heartedly subscribe to. But you guys were just too damn smart and figured it all out. How do you do it?
How about the torture and murder of women in the name of "Honour" being a not so secret tenet of that Islam Militant you find you can embrace in common cause against the evil that is Ricain? Oh, yes, you are nuanced enough not to "wholeheartedly" embrace. Hence you are Vichy. How do you do it?
Lemme try and follow your "logic" here.
Pepe would very much like to see the US defeated in iraq as he believes there is much more to fear from the generalization of pre-emptive strike philosophy than from the firecrackers of a couple of en-turbanated wackos. Therefore pepe must embrace all things related to islam extremism, for instance honor killings, not to mention excision and infibulation, the choping of the hands of thieves, and the lapidation of adulterors, as long as they are women.
Remind me what it was that you said earlier about non-sequiturs?
Claim: Pepe supports our enemy in Iraq.
Why say so? Because Pepe says "Pepe would very much like to see the US defeated in Iraq"
Who is our enemy in Iraq? Islam Militant [yes, the Sunni supremacists, Shia expansionists, the head-hackers and child bakers of all stripes, are all part of Islam Militant].
If one is defeated in Iraq how does this happen? It happens with the victory of our enemy, Islam Militant. So cheering on our defeat is to cheer on for the victory of the Enemy, good Ol IM. Viva Pepata!
But, says Pepata, "I don't cheer on Islam Militant WHOLEHEARTEDLY, after all the part where they eventually clobber left wing secular socialists ain't exactly my hobag."
So Pepata "just" cheers on IM with whatever part of the heart is needed to show IM that he's on their side, thank ye. After all, however much a good it is to clobber Ricains it ain't any fun if a Versaillian leech were to get taken for a Ricain. [That's what being Vichy is all about. Enough heart in the sycophancy to pleasure Grand Mufti Lovers, but not quite enough to be convicted of being oneself a 100% grade A GML.]
So Pepata Essentially Hearts 'em in their Jihad for the Radiant Islamic Future. But be happy, it's only enough to want them to WIN.
Ok, so the Lord of PP cheers on the Zarkies in his quest for a world free of Ricains or Neocons or anyone else not yet kneeling the vichy way. Better IM than USA is a stance. And finally we have prodded this clarity of stance out of the snark.
And because Ricains and Neocons have a yet good civilization Pepata can pose as he will for our enemy, while enjoying the full freedoms of this land, without fear of losing his noggin or his beggin.
However that freedom is not freedom from logic, nor from responsibility for the consequences of one's choices. He is for IM's triumph, then he has cast his lot with IM and with the world IM seeks to establish. You cannot be Vichy and be a simple Frenchman anymore, you are now a Frenchman who has cast his lot with Hitler and his National Socialism. . You cannot embrace the cause of IM, as it serves to destroy the people you hate, and then wash your hands of the stench of what you have embraced.
You, Pepe, have cast your lot with Islam Militant because you are stupid enough to think that "there is much more to fear from the generalization of pre-emptive strike philosophy than from the firecrackers of a couple of en-turbanated wackos". [uh huh Much more to fear from Churchillian action than from a gaggle of overrated street thugs with their laughable Brown couture].
Those en-turbanated dudes, as you get wrong [seen Madjad with a turban?], are not a few "wackos", unless you are prepared to now declare mainstream Islamic religious thought as "wacko". [ I dare ya speak that Truth to Power], they are the heart of Islam as it has been for a very long time. Shariah is IM. IM is all about Shariah. And you'd be damn hard pressed to rejigger the universe to convince Islam of otherwise. And the "Honour" killing you scorn, one of just hundreds committed in England alone in the last few years [England alone, never mind Paree] is Shariah all the way.
What is novel is that there are some in the West who allows us to look at the gritty details of applied Islam, whereas none would dare do so within the established Ummah. But don't worry, Pepata, for soon enough, and may you live to see it, your France will have a significant enough Islamic population for IM to walk the streets proud and Master of its domain. Then no one dare speak out as to what your alliance with that despicable ideology has wrought.
In the meantime I will be damned if I let you hide the meaning of your embrace of IM. You are hoping for the triumph of a truly evil system of thought. You will live, and die, with the consequences of that choice.
Embrace the suck
Better IM than USA is a stance.
But it isn't mine. My stance is better IM than the propagation of a pre-emptive strike philosophy that will surely lead the planet to destruction. Compared to nuclear warfare, the threat presented by IM in its present state, is rather insignificant. The best conclusion that could be derived from the iraqi adventure relates to the notion that wars are unwinable without the support of the broader international community. This trumps all else.
Then no one dare speak out as to what your alliance with that despicable ideology has wrought. In the meantime I will be damned if I let you hide the meaning of your embrace of IM. You are hoping for the triumph of a truly evil system of thought.
More grandiloquent and dramatic nonsense from you, chuck. You are well enough aware of what I think of religious extremism in its milder US form to understand perfectly that the affinity with IM you delude yourself in thinking you've unveiled stops at the iraqi border. If your evangelicals are despicable in their proselytizing fanaticism, certainly the wackos are too.
No, we are well aware of what you think of christianity, moderate, empty, or extreme. As for Islam we have a consistent attempt to pass off its mainstream viciousness as a few petty thieves or vandals, conjoined with an open support for its armed actions as long as jews, ricains, and those who support the spirit of democracy are getting clobbered.
To you Bush is a religious extremist, while the unenturbanated madjad is a useful ally to better epate les bourgeois. To you the Pope is evil raw and wriggly, and Arsefat a glorious friend and ally. To you the decaying ramparts of the churches of France are an intolerable reminder of a France not yet properly emasculated into the Vichy way; while the mosques rising like buboes over the body of Gaul are simply Opportunity to make sure that no more stinking "neocons" disturb your right to clasp Onan into extinction.
Look, why is it so hard for you to stare at your reflection in the mirror for just a few seconds? You are FOR Islam Militant in its war against us, you have chosen the power of Islam to better destroy that of the Yanks [those rubes you love to take from, even as you spit on them]. Your butt is Green, now squeal.
Post a Comment