I don't see any cognitive dissonance in a patriot wearing a patriotic t-shirt. I do wonder about socialists paying enough for a pair of pants to feed Bangladesh.
I realize you have difficulty with the logic behind what is referred to as "gauche caviar". Look at it as the mirror image of the red-state peasants who really can't afford to have republicans in power but who are the first to hit the voting booth for them.
The red-state peasants you are talking about are willing to take their chances on their own wits and tenacity rather than trusting sabre-rattling bureaucrats straight out of Gogol. I'm with them. Better to earn an honest buch than suck a politician's dick for 50 cents.
t's one of the most pukish things I can conceive. And one of the most dishonest there ever was. Barf ai, you always make this kind of peremptory statement but never seem to be able to articulate a semblance of reasoning behind it. Care to give it a shot this one time?
rather than trusting sabre-rattling bureaucrats straight out of Gogol so the political realm really isn't a spectrum but a binary choice between honest republican politicians and XIXth century bureaucrats ? A good vs evil kinda thing?
15 comments:
Only the brightest and best.
Yet another crime of lèse-gonzi.
Another example of praise the imbecile.
That Lefty-Law-rich-kid-from-Harvard journal is pukish. Hey, JJ, you should put a "barf alert" sign on such links!
Sorry, AI. It was a Harvard post. You still need the barf kitty on a Harvard post?
Something like this, AI?
Lefty-Law-rich-kid-from-Harvard
Is that reprehensible ? Just curious.
As redundant as reprehensible, Pepe. Don't you find the Prada fashions at the marches a bit odd?
AI, I thought this post needed an illustration.
I don't see any cognitive dissonance in a patriot wearing a patriotic t-shirt. I do wonder about socialists paying enough for a pair of pants to feed Bangladesh.
so only hobos can feed biafra?
I realize you have difficulty with the logic behind what is referred to as "gauche caviar". Look at it as the mirror image of the red-state peasants who really can't afford to have republicans in power but who are the first to hit the voting booth for them.
The red-state peasants you are talking about are willing to take their chances on their own wits and tenacity rather than trusting sabre-rattling bureaucrats straight out of Gogol. I'm with them. Better to earn an honest buch than suck a politician's dick for 50 cents.
t's one of the most pukish things I can conceive. And one of the most dishonest there ever was. Barf
ai, you always make this kind of peremptory statement but never seem to be able to articulate a semblance of reasoning behind it. Care to give it a shot this one time?
rather than trusting sabre-rattling bureaucrats straight out of Gogol
so the political realm really isn't a spectrum but a binary choice between honest republican politicians and XIXth century bureaucrats ? A good vs evil kinda thing?
Post a Comment