freecounterpoint: So few? I doubt it.

Thursday, September 15, 2011

So few? I doubt it.

8 comments:

Tecumseh said...: Study sounds just about right. Romneycare sucks, big time.

And the point is?; 9/15/2011 9:19 PM
Mr roT said...: You're all for it.; 9/15/2011 9:28 PM
Tecumseh said...: (xxx sucks, big time) ==> (all for it)

Typical implication in Rotter Logick. They go gaga over such pearls out in the hinterlands of Europe?; 9/16/2011 1:19 AM
Mr roT said...: No the logic goes like this:

1) Romney does A while Tecs is a resident of the state that Romney is leading.

2) A sucks hard, as is universally agreed.

3) Tecs supports Romney for president of the US.; 9/16/2011 5:00 AM
Tecumseh said...: .. predicated on the supposition that Romney has learned his lesson after messing up in Mass, and won't repeat the same mistake at the national scale.

Now, you may try to disprove this conjecture, but how can you? It's a hypothetical. All you can do is give odds. I'd say, it's 50%-50%. Good enough for you?; 9/16/2011 12:55 PM
Tecumseh said...: Rot wishes he'd thought of this repartee:

Lastly, just something to consider regarding Romney and Perry: Romney is attacking Perry on Social Security — but Perry is right on Social Security. Perry is attacking Romney on Romneycare — and Romney was wrong on that. Just sayin’.

Too late, you missed your chance.; 9/16/2011 12:56 PM
Mr roT said...: Good enough...?

Has he refudiated?; 9/16/2011 1:08 PM
Tecumseh said...: No. Maybe one of these days...; 9/16/2011 2:01 PM

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)