Seeking to explain why the God of Hope had fallen farther faster than any modern president, David Brooks of the New York Times argued that the tea-party movement had declared war on “the educated class.” He seemed to think this was some sort of inverted snobbery: If “the educated class” is for it — “health” “care” “reform,” cap-&-trade, Miranda rights for terrorists — Joe Six-Pack and his fellow knuckledragging morons are reflexively opposed to it.
6 comments:
Are we really catching up with Bulgaria when it comes to moving away from a one-party state? Hmmm... Isn't Steyn having one too many ouzos?
Seeking to explain why the God of Hope had fallen farther faster than any modern president, David Brooks of the New York Times argued that the tea-party movement had declared war on “the educated class.” He seemed to think this was some sort of inverted snobbery: If “the educated class” is for it — “health” “care” “reform,” cap-&-trade, Miranda rights for terrorists — Joe Six-Pack and his fellow knuckledragging morons are reflexively opposed to it.
Is David Brooks talking to Herr Rot?
My knuckles don't drag without Stone IPA. Hey, when you come over here, bring me a case!
My knuckles are getting so soft.
Shit. I hope Dukakis introduces him. Would be fitting.
Or Gorby.
Maybe NEU can borrow Chomsky. He'd be perfect.
Post a Comment