So much for Civilization being marked by how we care for our dead.
Showing posts with label Circle of Life. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Circle of Life. Show all posts
Sunday, July 11, 2010
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Da President Commode

"We look back at the Roman epoch with a sense of relief. We've learned so much since then. No longer do we consider our leaders to be gods among men. No longer do we hand them unearned and meretricious awards and prizes. We don't turn on and destroy members of previous administrations. We don't tolerate incompetent and corrupt sycophants in high office. We've learned to recognize disorders such as pathological narcissism and assure that the victims do not gain high office. Any president who placed his prestige on the line with an athletic contest would be laughed to scorn.
And as for political bloodshed, that kind of savagery has no place in a modern democracy. Any party that called for the assassination of an opposing leader -- say, George W. Bush -- would simply be run out of the public sphere. Unlike the Romans, we all understand the concept of consequences, that what goes around comes around. Don't we?"
Wish these were just rhetorical questions.
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Pig Slaughter in Cairo
Did someone already post this? If so, well, then here it is again. If not, then here it is.
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
Sunday, May 17, 2009
Sunday, February 08, 2009
Sex and The NEP Succinctly Explained
Saturday, February 07, 2009
Sunday, November 16, 2008
Hitchens on Hardball (10/24/08)
Hitchens continues to inject Classical Liberalism into today's GOP. In a different interview with Larry King, Hitchens took Palin to task for mocking genetic tests with fruit flies. While I watched it, I rooted on Hitchens while destroying fruit flies so annoyingly buzzing in front of me (I purged my apartment plants some time ago, but one or two fruit flies still linger).
Labels:
Circle of Life,
Hitchens,
Single-Malt Still Working
Thursday, November 13, 2008
Thursday, October 30, 2008
Thursday, September 11, 2008
Tuesday, August 12, 2008
Inventors, artists, philosophers and writers come and go, but buzz is forever...
For too long I've put up with Ph.Ds within all realms of academia parroting one-another without having read the primary sources: this is called intellectual laziness, but also a byproduct of the hustle and bustle of our era. Only a couple here and there would say, "I don't know anything about that subject... I need to learn more." Another historian I studied under (he studied at the mighty U of Wisconsin, Madison) always repeated, "No matter what you hear mft, always revisit the sources yourself: they will not disappoint." This has proven the case time and time again.
Here's a neat little piece by David Brooks, about how those Pseudo-Intellectuals need to keep up with their game -- it's important for picking up chicks. Get more technology is the key.
...there have been three epochs of intellectual affectation. The first, lasting from approximately 1400 to 1965, was the great age of snobbery. Cultural artifacts existed in a hierarchy, with opera and fine art at the top, and stripping at the bottom. The social climbing pseud merely had to familiarize himself with the forms at the top of the hierarchy and febrile acolytes would perch at his feet...
This code died sometime in the late 1960s and was replaced by the code of the Higher Eclectica. The old hierarchy of the arts was dismissed as hopelessly reactionary. Instead, any cultural artifact produced by a member of a colonially oppressed out-group was deemed artistically and intellectually superior.
During this period, status rewards went to the ostentatious cultural omnivores — those who could publicly savor an infinite range of historically hegemonized cultural products. It was necessary to have a record collection that contained “a little bit of everything” (except heavy metal): bluegrass, rap, world music, salsa and Gregorian chant [not to mention Tuvan/Mongolian throat-singing]....
But on or about June 29, 2007, human character changed. That, of course, was the release date of the first iPhone.
On that date, media displaced culture. As commenters on The American Scene blog have pointed out, the means of transmission replaced the content of culture as the center of historical excitement and as the marker of social status.
Here's a neat little piece by David Brooks, about how those Pseudo-Intellectuals need to keep up with their game -- it's important for picking up chicks. Get more technology is the key.
...there have been three epochs of intellectual affectation. The first, lasting from approximately 1400 to 1965, was the great age of snobbery. Cultural artifacts existed in a hierarchy, with opera and fine art at the top, and stripping at the bottom. The social climbing pseud merely had to familiarize himself with the forms at the top of the hierarchy and febrile acolytes would perch at his feet...
This code died sometime in the late 1960s and was replaced by the code of the Higher Eclectica. The old hierarchy of the arts was dismissed as hopelessly reactionary. Instead, any cultural artifact produced by a member of a colonially oppressed out-group was deemed artistically and intellectually superior.
During this period, status rewards went to the ostentatious cultural omnivores — those who could publicly savor an infinite range of historically hegemonized cultural products. It was necessary to have a record collection that contained “a little bit of everything” (except heavy metal): bluegrass, rap, world music, salsa and Gregorian chant [not to mention Tuvan/Mongolian throat-singing]....
But on or about June 29, 2007, human character changed. That, of course, was the release date of the first iPhone.
On that date, media displaced culture. As commenters on The American Scene blog have pointed out, the means of transmission replaced the content of culture as the center of historical excitement and as the marker of social status.
Sunday, June 22, 2008
Saturday, May 03, 2008
Stonewall Jackson Strikes One Last Time
Civil War buffs are a lot like Trekkies (Star Trek gurus): they can tell you how many musket balls were fired at a particular battle, or in the case of Trekkies speak Klingon. As for Civil War buffs, (and "history buffs" in general) they are particularly inept at how singular events reflect broader themes of the times.
At least I have one less to deal with now.
At least I have one less to deal with now.
Thursday, May 01, 2008
Sunday, April 20, 2008
Sunday, April 06, 2008
Tuesday, March 04, 2008
Friday, February 22, 2008
Friday, February 15, 2008
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)







