Showing posts with label Not A implies Not A for all A. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Not A implies Not A for all A. Show all posts

Monday, October 08, 2012

"Thou Shalt Not Pass"; in the AmeriSoc Graves of Academe

The Left A'Clam'in the American Mind ........................................................................ Some beauts:"Here are some of the responses we received: An affiliate with Hope College Stated: “After a brief review of your page, I quickly came to realize the surplus of nonsense your group is promoting to young Americans. If my acceptance of this event grants you further permission to come to Hope’s campus, I must decline any further participation.” Iowa State University: “You are not as liberal as advertised. We do not want you to be part of any activity on campus.” Trinity College: “A debate is something we are highly disinterested in. This is not something our university would want on our campus.” Loyola University: “Your organization will not be participating in any activity on campus.” A list of some fine Calliclean colleges is here: Drink the Hemlock But, of course, no American College is quite so comfortable with the Calliclean ethos as good ol' Versailles-on-Charles.................................... Cry me a River Charly, ye Stinking Peasants
......................................................................... Yup, a debate ain't something Charly wants sailing down his River. Besides, if a debate should by happenstance break out, the Professors know how to pick up the mighty grading pen: AmeriSoc would do Unto Romney as they would do unto FCP Ah, this is one shit taco that still stinks, after all these years.

Monday, July 23, 2012

Barnes contradicts AA

Where's my bottle of tawny? [Add a pic, per AA's learned comment.]

Friday, June 29, 2012

An attempt at Cartesian Logic

The Constitution requires tax increases to originate in the House of Representatives. See Art. I, §7, cl. 1. That is to say, they must originate in the legislative body most accountable to the people, where legislators must weigh the need for the tax against the terrible price they might pay at their next election, which is never more than two years off. The Federalist No. 58 “defend[ed] the decision to give the origination power to the House on the ground that the Chamber that is more accountable to the people should have the primary role in raising revenue.” We have no doubt that Congress knew precisely what it was doing when it rejected an earlier version of this legislation that imposed a tax instead of a requirement-with-penalty. Imposing a tax through judicial legislation inverts the constitutional scheme, and places the power to tax in the branch of government least accountable to the citizenry. Article $n$, Section $m$ does not apply...

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Sunday, February 05, 2012

In this Analysis the Proof is in the Classical Solutions

Als Klahr?. Not that Pepe and his peeps, rowing down the River Charly, have the wit to think through the implications of even the clearest of "arguments".

Friday, January 06, 2012

It's the Party Line, Prof. Oller, Capisce?

Marketplace of Ideas?? My my, next thing the rubes will be talking about is a Free Republic or that Constitution vision thing. The Little People are so amusing, n'est ce pas Monsieur CharleRoi?

Saturday, December 31, 2011

The Year of Living Blindly

"Tens of millions of Americans have yet to understand that the can no longer can be kicked down the road, because we're all out of road. The pavement ends, and there's just a long drop into the abyss."