freecounterpoint: Great. Just fucking great news.

Saturday, May 21, 2011

Great. Just fucking great news.

More.
Cops admit Guerena's safety on. Could not have fired. Still, worth killing, apparently because of a picture they found under his bed.
"Pictures, please."

9 comments:

Tecumseh said...: Isn't Dupnik that grandstanding pinko sheriff who was blowing off hot air after that madman shot Gabrielle Giffords? This guy is a putz.; 5/20/2011 6:17 PM
Mr roT said...: That's the guy.; 5/20/2011 8:46 PM
Tecumseh said...: RiP Jose Guerena. Clearly, he did not deserve being shot like a dog, for no reason whatsoever.

But hey, didn't Herr Rot tell us that Article $n$, Section $m$, as well as Amendment $k$ does not apply, for any positive n, m, or k? The rest is simply a logical consequence of this basic Rotter Axiom.; 5/21/2011 11:24 AM
Mr roT said...: Not clear that he was innocent, but trials usually last longer than that.

Seems that you and AA are the ones that want to rip up the Constitution. "Papers please," is just fine with you two France nostalgics.; 5/21/2011 11:30 AM
Arelcao Akleos said...: Nope, "Papers Please" is fine if you are identifying whom you are talking to in the context of constitutional police work.
It is more than fine, it is what all sane republics do routinely--know who the heck you are talking to.
Stormtrooper glorification of Might is Right is All Pepe, and His Rotter Dogs.

It takes a special sort of dePravda propagandist who can shamelessly conflate the two; 5/21/2011 12:07 PM
Mr roT said...: Your "Constitutional work" is vaguely defined.; 5/21/2011 12:13 PM
Tecumseh said...: AA has just drilled a new one in the mushy core of Rotter Constitutional Logick. No way you can recover from this smackdown, Herr Rott. Stop diggin', and start serving the Barolo.; 5/21/2011 12:26 PM
Mr roT said...: You two geniuses are the ones arguing in this context, that cops should have more power.

Impressive.; 5/21/2011 12:29 PM
Tecumseh said...: Herr Rott, Herrr Rrott, Herrrr Rrott. Maybe if you take a deep breath, and meditate on the question for 10 hours straight, you'll come to see there is a teeny teensy bit of a distinction between a copper (or the lady at the corner 7-11 for that matter) asking for your driver's license and a swat team busting open your front door in the middle of the night while you're sound asleep and pumping 80 slugs into your cerebellum. C'mon, is there a >0.00001% chance you'll see a >0.000000001% difference between the two scenarios in finite time?; 5/21/2011 5:56 PM

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)