Obama's Will be Brooken, on Frum as it is in Sullivan. Yeah, that's the ticket.
A Third Rail is, of course, exactly what the Obamaklean One is trying to engineer... to better fry the opposition. It worked for the gerbil Patrick, here in Mass, did it not? Fascinating to see the old "Inside the Beltway" GOPers [Versailles-apparently offers 'em godly supply of ambrosia and nectar]choose destruction for the party, and this country, over their Boy Romney Equivalent not getting it. Have you forgotten the Vichian role folks like Will, Frum, Brooks, never mind Sullivan, played in the serial destruction of Palin, Bachmann, Perry, and Cain? Of anyone, in fact, that threatened not to play by their Rino Rulz?
Will can take his favorite baseball bat and go the Full Pepe on himself.
Posts
10 comments:
Georgie doesn't come out and say that he's an arrow bearer for Huntmensch... That's AA throwing aspersions about randomly.
I wonder who AA really would support though. I guess Gingrich would be AA's choice as AA knows this idea of "youhave to win" unlike Tecs, who supports guys that can't win and would pull for more pinko political philosophy to boot.
Still, AA, you open up unembarrassed about your alternative conservative lifestyle choice and then dummy up suddenly when there's a split ticket among fruity, heretic GOPers...
Inquiring minds want to know.
Herr Rott pontificating about "heretic GOPers", after he pulled as hard as he could for Mac the Maverick, is a bit hard to take seriously.
In the meantime, Pepe is gloating. A great job, eh? Sounds like Mr Rot is trying to replay the 2008 campaign, all over again. With the same results.
What did Albert Einstein have to say about that?
Mac's VP choice is the only coherent GOPer left.
Oh yeah, her and Romneycare.
I mean Romney.
(Powww!!)
I thought individual mandates (for health-care insurance) were first proposed by Newt, back in the mid-1990s -- no?
"“You, George, have been saying that they should give Jon Huntsman a serious, second look,” Amanpour said. “I mean, you’re not happy that — are you? — that Gingrich is, as you say, now the solid front-runner?”
That's me throwing aspersions about randomly...according to Herr "Stochastic Process C'Est Moi" Rott.
"Still, AA, you open up unembarrassed about your alternative conservative lifestyle choice and then dummy up suddenly when there's a split ticket among fruity, heretic GOPers..."
What split ticket among fruity heretic Gopers? You claiming the Gop is gonna run a Paul-Huntsman ticket?
"I wonder who AA really would support though"
With enough Opium in this den I dream of a split electoral result into a brokered convention, resulting in a Palin-Rubio ticket [or at least a Gingrich-Palin ticket].
Alas, there ain't enough Opium in the 'verse to keep the horrible reality at bay: a brokered convention would give the Versailleans the clout to gift us with a Huntsman-Romney or a Romney-Graham ticket. Might as well go with deVoorhies VII or some other Andrew Sullivan equivalent. It might get PP so drunk with joy that I might be able to sneak into Palau.
Aaah, AA. Finally some bracing logic on this board after months of Tecsian feel-good RINO squish slobber about Romney's gel and Palin = dumm.
Thank you. I suspected there was some reason not to delete your account summarily.
Bottom line: most people simply don't like Romney. It's just one of those things. Why's that?
Thanks for the reminder, Tecs.
Post a Comment