somehow i am not surprised that, here again, Clarence Thomas would try to wreck it for the rest of us. If any additional proof was needed that this man is evil incarnate, that would be it.
I am wondering though what your feelings are about conservative attempts at regulating bedroom activity ? I am secretely hoping that there may be some point of agreement among us.
conservative attempts at regulating bedroom activity
Hey, this is a loaded premise, and a caricature to boot. Why should I agree that that's what the conservatives are doing? Methinks that's just Liberal paranoia, on a par with BUSH LIED!!! BLOOD FOR OIL!!!!!! (or is it the other way around?) If there is a factual, libertarian argument to be made (what exactly is W doing in my bedroom? I don't see anything here), let's hear it. But just name-calling Clarence Thomas for no reason at all is not an argument.
6 comments:
somehow i am not surprised that, here again, Clarence Thomas would try to wreck it for the rest of us. If any additional proof was needed that this man is evil incarnate, that would be it.
Huh? This is too deep for me. What does Clarence Thomas have to do with this?
read the article !
Oh, I see -- I had stopped at some point. Hitch does have stamina, you gotta give that to him.
yeh -
I am wondering though what your feelings are about conservative attempts at regulating bedroom activity ? I am secretely hoping that there may be some point of agreement among us.
conservative attempts at regulating bedroom activity
Hey, this is a loaded premise, and a caricature to boot. Why should I agree that that's what the conservatives are doing? Methinks that's just Liberal paranoia, on a par with BUSH LIED!!! BLOOD FOR OIL!!!!!! (or is it the other way around?) If there is a factual, libertarian argument to be made (what exactly is W doing in my bedroom? I don't see anything here), let's hear it. But just name-calling Clarence Thomas for no reason at all is not an argument.
Post a Comment