freecounterpoint: The Sears plot explained

Saturday, June 24, 2006

In pidgin-liberalese.

The Darkroom said...: hey didn't we say coulter/limbaugh & the left wing equivalent as proof of the stupidity of the other camp was sophistic?; 6/24/2006 8:35 PM
Tecumseh said...: Sophistic, non-sophistic, who knows? Fact is, liberal lingo is such a cliché, that it's almost trivial to parody, though this guy really hits it better than most:

12) Why does Amerikkka always use force to solve its so-called "problems"? Why no outreach? Why no sensitivity? Why no exploration of root causes? Why no reflexive purging of our centuries-old traditions of oppression and slavery that have driven others to the point where they have no choice but to resist with armed struggle?

I can hear dozens of bleeding-heart liberals I know saying just that, with perhaps minor variations. C'mon, even in Stalinist Russia they had more diversity of opinion, at least after a vodka or three!; 6/24/2006 9:40 PM
The Darkroom said...: aren't all lingos cliches ? do you find much originality in coulter's rhetoric ?; 6/25/2006 6:31 AM
Tecumseh said...: Coulter is a singularity. Liberal group-think is the norm in the intelligentsia. Nuance.; 6/25/2006 9:59 AM
The Darkroom said...: is rush also an outlier ?; 6/25/2006 10:30 AM