Friday, May 11, 2007

Baker Parrots Peters

Is there any real reason for alll this optimism?

20 comments:

Tecumseh said...

Color me skeptical. Or, as Baker says:

It will surely all end in tears, of course. Like many a French love affair, this latest assignation seems destined to break someone’s heart. And Americans will in time discover that the dull reliability of dour Scottish presbyterians or slippery English Tories still requites better than the mellifluous pledges of clever French reformers.

Pepe le Pew said...

i think there is an ambient amalgamation between opening up to the anglo-saxon economic system and support of all things american. It is rather entertaining to see the starry-eyed "Oh, my, will he love me for real?" reaction.

Mr roT said...

That must be the thing, Pepe. The Right thinks that economic freedom is naturally allied with other kinds too, so if Sarko is for freeing up labor markets in France, he must be for toppling bloodthirsty dictators in the middle east and africa.
Well, it's easier to free up a labor market in France if you have lots of free cash coming in from the colonies...

Tecumseh said...

Free cash coming from the colonies? Hey, JJ, dipping into that ouzo bottle, again? I will not argue about definition of "colonies" -- I take it you meant it metaphorically -- but how about "cash"? Wherefrom, and how much?

Pepe le Pew said...

In case you were wondering

Mr roT said...

Exactly, Pepe. These turds are talking right, but they're the same old commies.

Pepe le Pew said...

I guess by "commie", you just mean "not subservient to the interests of the usa" ?

Arelcao Akleos said...

an ambient amalgamation?? Alliteration addles

Arelcao Akleos said...

bt "Commie" is meant lickspittle of genocidal butchers..ya know, like Vichy and Mikey The Moore. By "communiss" is meant lickspittle of blood red genocidal butchers...ya know, like Chirac and Jane Fonda

Pepe le Pew said...

michael moore a genocidal butcher? of course, of course. get back on your meds, salazarito.

Pepe le Pew said...

i meant inho

Arelcao Akleos said...

If Pepe could read, which he has consistently shown he can't, he would see that I called Michael Moore a LICKSPITTLE of genocidal butchers. Ya know, the sort of guy who calls AQ guys "Minutemen"
Meds are for Versailles' Merde

Arelcao Akleos said...

Inho is what is meant, and inho means?

Mr roT said...

salazarinho

Arelcao Akleos said...

From Casa Slytherin

Arelcao Akleos said...

What hypocrisy, serpent of Versaille? Is the English too too hard for one's little dhimmi brain?
I am directly accusing Mikey Moore of being a LICKSPITTLE FOR GENOCIDAL BUTCHERS.
Ok, what does that mean?
To spell it out in careful detail, for our conceptually challenged Le Pew, it means this:
First, there are Genocidal Butchers. Succesful ones, such as Pol Pot, Hitler, the Hutu leaders, Stalin, Mao, Jong Ils, King Leopold, Sudan today. Not so succesful ones, such as Saddam, Milosevic, the Indonesian leaders against East Timor, the Palestinian Authority. These folks do the butchering, and butcher with the aim of eradicating whole classes of human beings.
Second, there are the Lickspittles to these Genocidal Butchers. Do they do the killing? Heck no, that takes cojones. They instead go down and lovingly Monica the spit of the Genocidal Butchers. They serve as apologists, as advocates, as filmakers, as admirers and sycophants and extollers of the wonderous quality of those GCs [or, as Pepe no doubt would rather phrase it, those so unfairly tarred with the same silly moralizing bourgeois brush by unfeeling Yankee unsophisticates]. Is Mikey Moore, of "Zarky is a Minuteman, Bush is a Hitler " renown a Lickspittle?? Yup, siree bob. So is Jane Fonda, so is Chirac [or at least was, that may depend on his oil vouchers still being valid]
Of course, given your enthusiasm for the Taliban, perhaps you are already tongue-ready, waiting only for some kindly GC to cast a loogie o' love in your direction.

Pepe le Pew said...

is what you refer to as my enthusiasm for the taleban the same type of process that gets you to conclude that moore servies as an apologist to whichever butchers you are thinking of?

Pepe le Pew said...

Do they do the killing? Heck no, that takes cojones.
i take note that you morphed from grandstanding against muslim extremism to admiring obl's cojones.

Arelcao Akleos said...

Apperently 2+2=5 is the sort of arithmetic Pepe yearns for.
Look, chump, Mikey Moore is very much a lickspittle for Genocidal Butchers. Like his friends in Answer and Chomskiana your Mikey, from "Fahrenheit 911" to "Zarky is a Minuteman" [heck, even to his Castro as Hippocrates current gig], has consistently aided and abetted those we fight.
But than a Vichyist like you is comfortable with the licking of spit. Remember your accusation that it was unfair to fight the taliban, and that Ricains were bullies, beating up on the helpless, in doing so? Or are you going to claim that , heck, Pepe needs no stinking memory and that I should do research for you on your own words???
By the way, remember your recent little
"hats off to the courageous villagers."
in that little piece where the fighting, in which Dadullah was killed, was claimed to your unresearching satisfaction, to have actually been against innocent villagers "No Taliban here"????
Yes, by all means hats off to the courageous villagers against those bullying Yanks with their clownish desire to off Taliban leaders.
Your enthusiasms are either clear in your words, or your words are scheit.

Arelcao Akleos said...

So "it takes cojones" is an expression of admiration? try a simple description of the difference between those who fess up to what they are, in action, like Islam Militant, and the fucks who lick their spit and act all macho only before the civilized and who bask in the reflected glow of actions they personally do not have the oojones for. Mikey Moore is such a fuck.
Now
"hats off to the courageous villagers."
There is admiration, Vichy