Rudy the abortionist's aide is doing wellissimo among the muslim-haters. What to do, AI and AA?
Tuesday, May 15, 2007
Ideological Purity of the Far Right
Rudy the abortionist's aide is doing wellissimo among the muslim-haters. What to do, AI and AA?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
12 comments:
Who are all these people? This reminds me that if you google santorum and check out what comes out first, you're in for a surprise.
Is there a debate tonight? On what medium?
there is a tv debate in SC among the rep candidates. it should be entertaining to hear giuliani trip over the abortion issue, as well as watching the others distancing themselves from dubbyah like he's a bad case of syphillis.
McCain, 2000
About McCain, AA, RCP has him closing in on Giuliani. The LGFers ain't agreeing.
An interesting point about SC and Falwell's death playing into Romney's hands here.
Too bad McCain couldn't have closed in on Bush 7 years ago. It's all probably far too late for him now
Don;t like McCain. Bush is better.
Bush is Tejas alright....I do believe that McCain would have fought a much more cohesive and determined campaign against Islam Militant after 911 than the Bush administration. It is not something we will ever know, except I do note that he has stayed steadfast in his support for waging war against IM in a way almost no one in the administration has.
McCain didn't have an iraq agenda prior to 9/11 unlike the bush crowd - he wouldn't have gone in there in the first place.
That is your supposition. What is known is that he has supported the Iraq venture, in aim if not in execution, from the beginning. His language for it has always been closer to the so called "Wolfowitz plan" than that of Bush. He made it clear cut after the overthrow of the Taliban that he understood that was just the beginning, and supported the move into Iraq. Had he been President would he have chosen a different stress point of Islam Militant than the Baathists and their "Soviet Game" of playing godfather to terrorists? Possibly, but if so he has never given an indication of what it would have been.
Of course, that there was much good reason to make Baathists the next target is uncomfortable both for you and Bush. For you because you are Versailles, and if it isn't about the conspiracies of moneyed elites then it is beyond your ken to grasp. For Bush because the terrible failure to have the courage of the step into Iraq, and to have immediately used Iraq to pressure Baath Syria and the Iranian Mullahs, rather than to sit back on rely on their "good wishes", is the moment of idiocy which in retrospect will be seen as what almost [or still may] cost us victory against IM
See Bernard Lewis' column above.
Post a Comment