More Pepean logic: The math has never worked for this argument —uncompensated care provided by hospitals and other providers makes up less than 3 percent of annual health spending, and is largely offset by government subsidy of the institutions — but that hasn’t stopped many from repeating it.
Advocates of a larger government role in health finance find it expedient to claim, improbably, that increasing subsidy and insuring more people will reduce costs. This isn’t so much a free-lunch claim as it is a you'll-be-paid-to-eat-filet-mignon claim.
Ah, the Alice in Wonderland quality of Pepe Thought.
2 comments:
More Pepean logic: The math has never worked for this argument —uncompensated care provided by hospitals and other providers makes up less than 3 percent of annual health spending, and is largely offset by government subsidy of the institutions — but that hasn’t stopped many from repeating it.
Advocates of a larger government role in health finance find it expedient to claim, improbably, that increasing subsidy and insuring more people will reduce costs. This isn’t so much a free-lunch claim as it is a you'll-be-paid-to-eat-filet-mignon claim.
Ah, the Alice in Wonderland quality of Pepe Thought.
Kristol said it best, calling this all 'juvenile happy-talk.'
Post a Comment