freecounterpoint: One, two, or three, Tecs?

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

You see? You can only put up three choices and they can't be so specific. You and VDH don't know from these things.

Mr roT said...: Douthat making the obvious argument. I hope Obama rejects it.; 1/20/2010 11:24 PM
Tecumseh said...: Good article -- short and to the point. In this case, those 3 possibilities seem to be sufficient, and the guy sets them up well. On the other hand, VDH was talking about a much wider issue, so it seems appropriate to have a wider range of possible scenarios. Herr Rot, you're being too simplistic. Try nuance, once in a while, willya?; 1/20/2010 11:43 PM
Tecumseh said...: You're right about Douthat. And I think his scenario is an elaboration on one of VDH's seven scenarios (was it #1 on his list?) -- but the one least likely to occur. Again, logically it makes sense, but what does Cartesian logic have to do with Pepean logic?; 1/20/2010 11:46 PM
Mr roT said...: When it comes to winning an election, the Dems know how to do it.; 1/21/2010 12:04 AM