freecounterpoint: .338 Win. Mag?

Monday, May 03, 2010

.338 Win. Mag?

6 comments:

Tecumseh said...: Not bad, not bad. But a Hellfire missile shot from a helo is more efficient -- and reliable.; 5/03/2010 5:57 PM
Mr roT said...: Efficient??? Would have killed the CO and cost a half million bucks!; 5/03/2010 6:35 PM
Arelcao Akleos said...: Apparently, according to Rott, the Brits are as lousy with missile fire as they are good with sniping.
Evidence?; 5/03/2010 6:38 PM
Mr roT said...: Apparently, according to AA and Tecs, killing one's CO is good bull!; 5/03/2010 6:49 PM
Arelcao Akleos said...: Hmmm, this is Rotterian Transitivity. If a Talib is in range to kill a Brit, and another Brit is in range to kill that Talib, then that second Brit will kill that first Brit if he uses anything stronger than a remington. That hellfire missile must have quite a killing radius, fo sho.
Wonder what the marines were doing when they called in artillery fire to positions only 50 yards from themselves? Oh, yeah, they wouldn't have dared if it was Brit artillery.; 5/03/2010 7:24 PM
Arelcao Akleos said...: That would be Arse. This is the Brits you're putting in a stone's throw of a Talib, muchacho.; 5/03/2010 9:09 PM

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)