That story has been removed from the site Every so often we are forced to remove stories from our site. We’re sorry but you just happened to request one of them. Your typical Rotter link. Rule #1 of html: check before you link.
Day at the office. As for html prowess: once you link to a story, you are morally obliged to make sure the link is still functional. If it's not you're supposed to re-link to another source, or take it down. Absent that, the conclusion is crystal-clear: pay. Or add to the tab. The tab.
9 comments:
The article has been pulled...what did it say?
That story has been removed from the site
Every so often we are forced to remove stories from our site. We’re sorry but you just happened to request one of them. Your typical Rotter link. Rule #1 of html: check before you link.
This.
Preposterous.
Actually, Tecs, the link worked before, so you can pay up now.
Longer form. More ridiculous.
Day at the office. As for html prowess: once you link to a story, you are morally obliged to make sure the link is still functional. If it's not you're supposed to re-link to another source, or take it down. Absent that, the conclusion is crystal-clear: pay. Or add to the tab. The tab.
This problem is clearly your fault. I never would have hit a link from "The Washington Times" back in the days before your bad influences.
It stands to reason that your and DebkAA's sites regularly pull their made-up articles and so this would never happen to anyone but you and he anyway.
Summa: This is your fault, so I don't owe you shit.
Refusing individual responsibility, are we?
It's for schmucks. Duh.
Post a Comment