Saturday, November 08, 2008

The horsemen of the Apocalypse

More here.

4 comments:

Arelcao Akleos said...

"Three years ago a leading Chinese dissident, Wei Jingsheng, warned of a serious threat from China. According to Wei, Russia has agreed to China’s future military plans which include a possible nuclear strike against the United States. Regarding this testimony the CIA has corroborating intelligence, though few in Washington give it any credence. In 1998 a Russian military intelligence defector, Col. Stanislav Lunev, told journalists that Russia and China could defeat the United States in a future war. I was in the room when Col. Lunev, a military specialist trained in the Chinese language, stated that Russia has the missile power and China has the manpower to defeat America. This is an idea that would never occur to an American, and is difficult to for Americans to digest."

I've been following this for some time, as many who've had the chance to escape the self-blinded cocoon of the MSM and seen what is occurring in Asia for themselves...
One of the key points, as even a Versaillean roue' may one day admit [even it is the literally the very last flash of insight he'll ever have] is that the enemies of the West, and Democracy, have been studying and learning from History with far fiercer attention than the self-aggrandizing blowhards of our Bleu Universities.
The "Elite" of this Earth are steeped in madness.

Arelcao Akleos said...

As Nyquist says in a previous article:
"As little time is left, it is best to be explicit. There is something in the Western mentality that denies the approach of danger. We are so accustomed to convenience we no longer believe in the necessity of inconveniencing ourselves. Such should not be allowed. And yet, the great inconvenience of the hour is the inconvenience required for continued survival. Oh well, we say to ourselves: if it is that much trouble let us perish together in a heap"
Straight from Planet Pepe

Mr roT said...

Nyquist's theorem?

Arelcao Akleos said...

Let's hope there is a flaw in the Proof