Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Obscurantists defeated in CT

12 comments:

Mr roT said...

Wait till there's a referendum.

Pepe le Pew said...

These things can only be slowed down, man. Eventually we will prevail. If you'd seen Kayla in her mini-wedding dress, you'd feel entirely differently.

Mr roT said...

The one where her glans hangs below the hemline?

Pepe le Pew said...

nice and juicy. miam.

Arelcao Akleos said...

Actually, the opponents of Gay marriage are not obscure at all. They are in fact eminently clear. In answer to the question: "Do you vote for or against Poofter Nupts"? The answer comes, resoundingly, No!.
The obscurantism then enters with Versailleans who, so entranced by little boy parts, get brainfreeze when confronted with simple words such as "No". The same exact problem Plato had at his Symposia when Phaedrus told him: "hey, dude,like, I like girls, ya know.?"
Le Pew and Plato, two murky pisses in the same pissoir.

Arelcao Akleos said...

Eckern was a Counter Revolutionary Wrecker. It shows the depths of magnanimity to be found on Planet Pepe that he was allowed to avoid the Guillotine.

Mr roT said...

They don't chop heads, AA. They suck them.

Arelcao Akleos said...

Wicklepedia has them both under "Headhunters". Damn that untrustworthy wickle of pedias.

Mr roT said...

Trolling for beej.

Pepe le Pew said...

Seems we have a definition issue here:

obscure: 1. (of meaning) not clear or plain; ambiguous, vague, or uncertain: an obscure sentence in the contract.

obscurantist: 1. opposition to the increase and spread of knowledge.

So casting opposition to gay marriage as "defense of marriage" would be opposing increase of knowledge using a type of sophistry known as a non-sequitur.

Mr roT said...

Wrong.

Arelcao Akleos said...

Le Pew doesn't realize his petard has him hoisted right up the butt about now [probably thinks Kayla is just particularly "iron"ic today].