[AA has put up 3 hideous photos to rival and surpass ones that Pepe subjected us to. I don't want them on the front page here because I do occasionally look at it. Anyone needing this kind of snuff imagery is welcome to view it at the following 3 links: 1, 2, 3. Begging your pardon, JJ.]
COMMENT, from AA: It's your blog, JJ, so do with it what you will. However, I would remark that the point of those images was not to satisfy the "needs" of those who are partial to such stuff [they can get their full jollies at a plenitude of jihadist websites and chat groups] it was to bring to the fore the brute reality behind that sorry euphemism of "honor" killing. To whom? To those who are so "brave" as to minimize, or ignore, or make much of cheering on [all in fine irony, bien sur], the actions of the Good Muslim Militant. Such are unlikely to follow links to see what they choose not to see.
It would be clarifying to be confronted with what just exactly they wish to minimize, ignore, or (ironically, yeah that's it) cheer on.
But, hey, it's your blog.
"the 10th in eight years to be killed for supposedly breaching the family's "honour".
No Doghouses on Planet Pepe, just Abattoirs for Bitches.
Friday, December 05, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
8 comments:
Nah, it's our blog, not mine. But when I hid the nauseating stuff Pepe put up, I didn't get any protest from you, so it must have been ok in principle.
Not to offend, but those images are not necessary for us to get the idea of what these barbarians are up to.
Simple, JJ. I didn't know you had hid stuff of Pepe's. So I don't even know what that stuff would have been for. If I had known you had done that I would have protested. Unless you think an image is illegal [i.e., to post it would get into trouble with the law] I am not for preventing anyone from posting a picture they deem relevant to whatever point/argument they are trying to make.
Not to offend, but I do not think all people who read these posts are honest, with themselves or others, as to what these barbarians are about. They choose not to see.
The MSM censoring, after the initial day or two, photos of the WTC which showed people falling from the sky. Later, photos which simply showed the people screaming for help from the windows. Now, limited to shots of the buildings smoking, at a distance, with the human element restricted to the occasional dust covered man or woman fleeing the scene. Has had its full effect. Many today have no apparent recall of ever seeing such things, or perhaps never have seen it. And that obliteration of memory is useful to some.
.....Whatever.
Pepe would have an identical argument. He posted some 'fine potography' of a horribly mangled marine in dress uniform marrying a pretty girl.
A perfect defense of posting such studd is that those of us that support the war and not aware that there really are consequences to our fat dumb happy support for the war on principle.
I didn't accept that, thinking that civility and rational discourse are the common foundation on which to have discussion and that abstract knowledge of atrocity and bloodletting isufficient to inform reasoned opinion.
I stand by that assessment and I think I am roughly in the right as I get crap from both you and Pepe to roughly commensurate degrees about this kind of thing.
We could ask AI, who also admins this blog whether those images of yours should be put back up. My guess is that he would agree with me having applauded my identical 'censorship' of his snuff shots.
If that "horribly mangled" marine had the guts to have his wedding photograph taken after being so mangled, and he had a wife who had the quality to marry her man after he had been so mangled war, don't think it was me you were protecting by not allowing Pepe to post it.
From what you say, presumably Pepe thought we who support the war against IM weren't aware of what war can do???? So he's dead wrong. Does that mean he shouldn't have been able to set out his "argument" as he thought it effective? And if he couldn't set it out as he wished, then how could I well respond to his true intention?
Look, JJ, the links are there. That's far more than what the MSM does for the more painful photographic record of 9/11. So....whatever. But, just for the record, yes, on this issue I seem to be in full agreement with Le Pew.
Can you send me a link to that marine? I'd like to see it for myself. Thanks.
So you didn't put in a link to it in Pepe's post?
.......whatever.
long time ago
I did replace the front page stuff Pepe put up with links. Just as I did with you. I do not know where they are. It's been a year maybe.
Post a Comment