Sure, Papa Bush "appointed" his son to presidency. Al Gore and the Democrats had no say as Chimpie seized the reins of power. Kennedy would be appointed to the Senatorial position without need of having to face an opponent in an election. Yes, as far as making the world safe for tyranny this is definitely a step up.
it's as simple an issue as they come - it's either legal or it isn't. But if you are interested in revisiting the rationale of the democratic process in the United States, there are seriously larger issues, particularly on the level of one man one vote. This is chicken shit.
Sure, to the would be dictators of the Democrat Party, where Chicago style "10 votesper my man, 1/2 for you" is just ho hum One Party State politics, anointing a Queen without the debasement of actually having to listen to peasants is, as you say, chicken shit.
Uh huh, Le Pew, your timing was fucking impeccable. The Gods couldn't have arranged a better hoisting of a Pepe by his Petard if they had called upon the cunning of Odysseus. Or is your "argument" now goint to be that compared to one of your comrades selling a Senate seat to the highest bidder the mere act of playing dictator and treating a Senate seat as the private purview of the Aristos, impervious to silly formalities of democracy, is chickenshit by comparison? Ya know, like criticizing Castro for killing over 100,000 people is chickenshit once you've seen real Socialist Shock and Awe?
Pathetic twat. Enjoy the swim in that cesspool that is your own private Versailles.
10 comments:
I think papa bush pretty much appointed his most delayed child to the presidency of the united states. this is definitely a step up.
Sure, Papa Bush "appointed" his son to presidency. Al Gore and the Democrats had no say as Chimpie seized the reins of power.
Kennedy would be appointed to the Senatorial position without need of having to face an opponent in an election.
Yes, as far as making the world safe for tyranny this is definitely a step up.
it's as simple an issue as they come - it's either legal or it isn't. But if you are interested in revisiting the rationale of the democratic process in the United States, there are seriously larger issues, particularly on the level of one man one vote. This is chicken shit.
I agree. People that vote by identity should not be allowed the vote.
vote by identity ?
Sure, to the would be dictators of the Democrat Party, where Chicago style "10 votesper my man, 1/2 for you" is just ho hum One Party State politics, anointing a Queen without the debasement of actually having to listen to peasants is, as you say, chicken shit.
Barney Frank's been anointed? With oil? Ugh.
your meds, aa, your meds. you know you become instantly delirious when you skip one.
Uh huh, Le Pew, your timing was fucking impeccable. The Gods couldn't have arranged a better hoisting of a Pepe by his Petard if they had called upon the cunning of Odysseus. Or is your "argument" now goint to be that compared to one of your comrades selling a Senate seat to the highest bidder the mere act of playing dictator and treating a Senate seat as the private purview of the Aristos, impervious to silly formalities of democracy, is chickenshit by comparison?
Ya know, like criticizing Castro for killing over 100,000 people is chickenshit once you've seen real Socialist Shock and Awe?
Pathetic twat. Enjoy the swim in that cesspool that is your own private Versailles.
Post a Comment