Monday, December 08, 2008
Say it ain't so, Pepe
Your buddies from Gitmo are gonna plead guilty to murder? Ah, mais non, mais non! Surely all these Binnie Boys (starting with KSM) are innocent. Just let them go -- to Nawlins, there is a nice little house right next door to Pepe, surely he'd love to have those innocent poor little souls persecuted by big bad W-Rove-Halliburton-Cheney next to his bosom.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
15 comments:
7 years of waterboarding and Koran-flushing, AI.
Irish pork chops?
In the cartesian logic class you flunked ai, remember the bit about
not all are A NEQ all are not A ?
I ust hope this pleading guilty thing doesn't mean we can't kill 'em or at least send them to counseling.
Would a life sentence of psychiatric counseling (you know, to discuss their latent homosexuality) be worse than straight up execution?
You mean death by bunda...
Pepe: Your attempt at lecturing on Logic 101 is hilarious. You wouldn't know a syllogism from a sophistry if it hit you in the face.
At any rate, and until further notice, I assume all the Binnie boyz now at Gitmo are guilty as hell. You give me a solitary counterexample, and then we talk. Till then, up yours.
Your attempt at lecturing on Logic 101 is hilarious.
Just pointing out that the topic doesn't seem to be your strong point either.
I assume all the Binnie boyz now at Gitmo are guilty as hell
In other words, if A therefore A. Very cartesiany indeed.
Reworking the notion of burden of proof ? Ok.
Here's five,
Here's 82
Here's one that wrote a book about it:
http://www.amazon.com/Five-Years-My-Life-Guantanamo/dp/0230603742
(A) Burden of proof is a concept (from the US Constitution) that applies to US citizens, or legal visitors, etc. It does not apply to foreign, unlawful combatants, like KSM, who took arms against the US, without wearing the uniform of a State.
(B) The cases you cite are ancient (2006 or so). I said, I assume all the Binnie boyz now at Gitmo are guilty as hell, and again, someone detained at Gitmo. If your IQ were above room temperature, you would probably have realized that that refers to the present. So again, let me spell it out, slowly: Do you know of, yes or no, of someone detained right now at Gitmo by US forces who is not there for legitimate reasons?
Puffing yourself like aa here. Very impressive.
back at you: given the staggering number of documented unwarranted arrests at gitmo, is there any reason to believe that more innocent people aren't in there?
what bullshit, Le Pew. Having no leg, of evidence or reason to stand on, you puff up like a blowfish and hope the rubes are impressed by all that pent up gas.
In war thousands get caught in combat and, if not killed, become prisoners of war. This is not arrest, it is capture of the enemy. This is not Cloiseau stuttering after the cad, it is the capture of enemy combatants. And, just because you jizz yourself when ogling those enemy combatants you so love does not change what they are. When you have war can people not involved, or regretting having been involved, or playing the Good Soldier Schweik of IM, get caught up in it? Sure. Did our government try to sort out who was who? Sure. Did our government make grotesque mistakes in this sorting out? Sure, just witness the number of those let go who quicktime were off to kill or be killed in another front of Jihad, laughing at the rube Yankees who had been so easily deceived.
Of course you want them to go free, that very hard core that remains. If let go , many would return oh so very fast to the sacred duty of increasing the stock of Dead Ricains. And that's an ambition any corrupt piece of Versailles' cesspool can drink his champagne to.
With Planet Pepe, it is Total Corruption.
No need to "puff up" when faced with such weak arguments as yours, Pepe. You make it too easy to refute your barely digested pinko Party line.
And, no, there is no reason whatsoever to believe any of the Binnie boys at Gitmo is "innocent", except in your feverish imagination. Why would Uncle Sam waste his time with 2-bit punks? Those that could go, left a while ago (though, of course, many of those "innocents" who were let go, went right back at hacking heads, as is their wont). Those who are left are the hard core, such as KSM, the mastermind of the 9/11 attacks. But surely, he's "innocent" in your eyes.
Why would Uncle Sam waste his time with 2-bit punks?
one word: ineptitude.
Post a Comment