freecounterpoint: A whole new reason to deport Tecs and AA

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

You're in Mexico, you wetbacks!

Tecumseh said...: 1810<1776? Sure. Just redefine <.; 9/22/2010 2:58 AM
Mr roT said...: Mexico was called Mexico way before 1820. The USA wasn't called the USA till 1776.

If you don't know your history, Tecs, maybe we should think of a relocation...; 9/22/2010 3:00 AM
Tecumseh said...: Being called something ain't the same as declaring yourself independent, let alone proving it.; 9/22/2010 3:02 AM
Mr roT said...: Depends, Tecs. At that time in Europe, there were a lot of empires around, so that a Spaniard (Mexican in your map) might be in Naples and a citizen there, but not be an Italian....

You get my drift.

I think Obama is right, so get out.; 9/22/2010 3:05 AM
Tecumseh said...: I got lost with the convoluted "logic" in your argument. Which premise implies which conclusion, why do the claimed implications hold, and how does it all hang together?

I hope and pray you apply higher standards when writing the real stuff. Like, (A\Rightarrow B)\not \equiv (\bar{A} \Rightarrow \bar{B}).; 9/22/2010 1:58 PM
Mr roT said...: What's the closure in propositional logic, Tecs?

Jeez, yer loosin it.; 9/22/2010 2:09 PM
Mr roT said...: Apparently. He seems to think the Spaniards were real nice back then, just like the lady that makes the good tortillas in the taquito place.; 9/22/2010 8:57 PM