Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Why Tecs should learn about cellphones

Pants down. Goddam.

4 comments:

Mr roT said...

The lack of Cellphones ==> idiocy.

But you're close. I mean you got A==> B when it was supposed to be ¬A==>B.

Take a VCP off your tab.

Tecumseh said...

"Supposed to be"? What's that supposed to mean? You are making an assertion. Is that supposed to be an axiom (of Rotter Logick), or a theorem (in usual logic). If the latter, you need to supply a proof, not just wave hands, or mutter about \lesssims.

Tecumseh said...

On topic.

Mr roT said...

Tecs and AA, you'd better not be condescending before doing some statistics on your classes...