Thursday, September 15, 2011

Pepe sprays his pants

[Add pic -- tecs]
REGURGE: Even the NYT calls bullshit on Pepe's Dostoyevski.

12 comments:

Mr roT said...

Comical.

How can she have a fetish for black guys if she's lynching them for the hell of it every Sunday in Church?

Charly said...

Read the rest of the article: she was high on pot & coke.

Mr roT said...

Duh, when I'm in Church, I am on whatever I can get my hands on.

What are you, a conservative or something?

Charly said...

There aren't any moments in the political show as delightful as when some loud-mouthed finger-wagger gets busted doing the opposite of what they preach.
She's never looked so good.

Mr roT said...

She got busted having some guy lie about her. Pretty lame.

Tecumseh said...

Hmmm... Is this for real? Extrapolating from previous Rotter favorites, I'm wondering now about skeletons in Perry's closet. Sure he's squeaky clean?

Charly said...

We'll find out where this goes, but if a hint of similar allegations had been made about, say, Hill or Pelosi, you'd be treating them like rock solid fact (see e.g. your handling of the unverifiable Chirac cash suitcase story).

Mr roT said...

Chirac's been in a lot of trouble before and dives for the presidential immunity gambit before bothering with details like charges. Where' there's smoke there's fire, and Chirac's character is common knowledge.

The reason they pulled out of Iraq is because W cut them out of juicy deals that they could corrupt. This is common knowledge. It was poor politics, but it was an appropriate judgment of what France could provide to the effort (besides a vote at the UN which is an anachronism), i.e. zero; see Libya.

Hillary I would have thought about equal to McCain if the previous election had gone that way. Nothing much against her.

It is now universally held a pity that the Dem primaries went the way you guys further to the left wanted it... Let's not talk about that fucktard.

Pelosi is simply a moron.

Charly said...

The situation with Libya is a poor analogy. Besides the fact that Sarko is not Chirac, there was an active movement of liberation in Libya that called for an intervention from abroad - to convince yourself of this, recall the resentment from the Iraqi population towards the US at the time of their 'liberation'.

Your point is that W cut them out of juicy (no-bid) deals he had reserved for his cronies, and I remember that well, but it speaks more poorly of the former administration than it does of Chirac.

Mr roT said...

The situation to which I was referring with Libya was not an analogy. I was saying that if France wanted to have a lot to say in Iraq, then they should be able to contribute to the effort.

Now, unencumbered with the "moral issue," France is having trouble knocking Libya down, and it's a much easier task there, partly because of the home-grown opposition, but mostly because the country is run like shit.

This was a tactical error on the part of W and cohort, but it's not a moral error. Governments can decide whether foreigners get to play ball. The fruity concierges' error was moral though because they made Saddam's position defensible.

Incidentally, the reason that Iraq didn't have much of a home-grown opposition is that Saddam's cops were a lot rougher and better than Qaddafi's.

That's hardly a reason for deeming the Libya thing as being more moral.

Tecumseh said...

What does this have to do with Sarah playing the field? You guys are losing track of the real story here.

Mr roT said...

Read the title. Pepe sprays his pants thinking of Palin and Villepin.