Saturday, June 20, 2009

How many shocks in one piece?

(Ex?) NYT Pinko Ayatollah Apologist AntiZionist Douchebag #1, Roger Cohen seems to have figured out not only that maybe the ayatollahs are not so nice after all, but he also has a disgusting jingoistic flagwaving scrotumlick for the (previously) detested, sickening, interventionist AmeriKKKa:

Another whisper: “Where are you from?” When I say the United States, he says: “Please give our regards to freedom.”

At the end of the day, even Obama's scrotum gets Cohen's attention, but with a kick there.

I would put him still among the 6%, nut at least an Israeli and not an Iranian imam.

4 comments:

Mr roT said...

Which brings me to President Barack Obama, who said in his inaugural speech: “Those who cling to power through corruption and deceit and the silencing of dissent, know that you are on the wrong side of history; but that we will extend a hand if you are willing to unclench your fist.”

Seldom was a fist more clenched than in the ramming-through of this election result. Deceit and the attempted silencing of dissent are now Iran’s everyday currency. In this city of whispers one of the whispers now is: Where is Obama?


Indeed, where is Lindsey Lohan Hussein Obama?

Answer yukking it up with a barracks of ass-lickers.

Goddamn this moron we have.

Mr roT said...

Continued:

The president has been right to tread carefully, given poisonous American-Iranian history, but has erred on the side of caution. He sounds like a man rehearsing prepared lines rather than the leader of the free world. A stronger condemnation of the violence and repression is needed, despite Khamenei’s warnings. Obama should also rectify his erroneous equating, from the U.S. national security perspective, of Ahmadinejad and Moussavi.


Erred on the side of caution Cohen says. Curiouser and curiouser.

You think this is an error or a character trait?

Mr roT said...

Shrugging away these distinctions like a dispassionate professor at a time when people are dying in the streets of Iran is no way to honor this phrase in his Inaugural Address: “Know that America is a friend of each nation and every man, woman and child who seeks a future of peace and dignity, and that we are ready to lead once more.”

When I was here earlier this year, I argued that Iran was an unfree and repressive society but also a nation offering significant margins of liberty, at least by regional standards, with which Obama’s America must engage. After Iraq, I was deeply concerned that facile stereotyping of a society of “mad Mullahs” bent on nuclear Armageddon could once again set America in lockstep to war.

I underestimated how brutal the regime could be. But my critics underestimated how strong and broad the Iran of civic courage and democratic impulse is, and they misread how important this election was, dismissing it as the meaningless exercise of a clerical dictatorship.

I still believe there is no alternative to engagement. But it is not the time for Obama to talk about talks. He should be talking about his outrage at the violence.

Mr roT said...

By the numbers.