Robinson finds it absurd that Gingrich would say, "How we don't have some kind of movement in this country on the left that understands that sharia is a direct mortal threat to virtually every value that the left has is really one of the most interesting historical questions."
There are various levels at which you can interpret the logical implications hidden in this little gem. But of course, it all revolves around the self-contradictory nature of the pinko mind, whose logical inconsistencies are like a snake coiling around itself to eat its tail, and, ultimately, itself.
It all reminds me of those Escher drawings, with bugs crawling around a Möbius band -- or is it "inside" and "out" of a Klein bottle?
4 comments:
Robinson finds it absurd that Gingrich would say, "How we don't have some kind of movement in this country on the left that understands that sharia is a direct mortal threat to virtually every value that the left has is really one of the most interesting historical questions."
There are various levels at which you can interpret the logical implications hidden in this little gem. But of course, it all revolves around the self-contradictory nature of the pinko mind, whose logical inconsistencies are like a snake coiling around itself to eat its tail, and, ultimately, itself.
It all reminds me of those Escher drawings, with bugs crawling around a Möbius band -- or is it "inside" and "out" of a Klein bottle?
I didn't understand the italicized stuff up there at all.
Does that mean I am smart or dumb?
Dumb. Of course, the convention on this board is that, when quoting something, you italicize that something. Duhhh...
I could use a cold Harpoon now.
I knew that the italicized stuff was a quote. What I don't understand is the point of the quote.
Could you post more chicks?
Post a Comment