Yes, Mr Rot--that piece of Guardian drivel is up there for the stupidest shit of the year. We gotta have a prize here.
Speaking of logic, how do you guys parse this Weinerische answer? Is that a yes or a no? Or does it depend on what the definition of is is? Or, perhaps, it depends on whether the Axiom of Choice holds?
6 comments:
Nah. The Year is Young, and the Progessives' progress to Ultima Stupidita is inexorable.
Dunno. There was a lot of A => ¬A in there.
Ann Coulter thinks a lot clearer.
Yes, Mr Rot--that piece of Guardian drivel is up there for the stupidest shit of the year. We gotta have a prize here.
Speaking of logic, how do you guys parse this Weinerische answer? Is that a yes or a no? Or does it depend on what the definition of is is? Or, perhaps, it depends on whether the Axiom of Choice holds?
Twisting, twisting....
"it could have been a photograph that was taken out of context"
Quit twisting my words! Ouch!!
More: His answer ranks “somewhere below ‘no controlling legal authority’ and above ‘wide stance.’ ” Weiner is fast becoming a classic of the genre.
Post a Comment