
Saturday, November 07, 2009
And He Don't Mean With Da Russkies

But when the shit hits the celestial fans, at least we know it won't be a life and death struggle between tyranny and freedom..........It will be a clobberfest between two competing Socialist shitholes. And when it comes to practiced long term success, shithole against shithole, ma money's on da Chinese.
The Barbarians of Mecca, natch, ransack the ruins and declare themselves lords of Earth.
Imam plays nicey...
...then doesn't get around to telling us why he didn't report Hasan.
Duh. It's about love.
Duh. It's about love.
Friday, November 06, 2009
My Pet American Indian
Best comment: It's so hard to act solemn when you really want to shout Allahu Akbar!
Peters and the dog-whistle.
Peters and the dog-whistle.
More Harvardenscheiße
With riposte:
Vietnam War defeat shuns the guilt of the nation
Citing the battle of Lam Son 719 in 1971, at best hardly won by communist forces, and concluding the incapability of the South Vietnamese army to stand on its own is the quintessence of hollowness. This writing clearly betrays the formation quality and dishonors both the West Point academy and the University of Chicago. The author's ignorance in logistics is criminal. With nearly a million of SEATO troops involved, with the naval blockade and air raids by the 7th Fleet, by squadrons of B-52s, the U.S. could hardly convince the North communists to seat down in Paris and sign a perfunctory peace treaty that they immediately thrashed away. Yet with no significant involvment of U.S. troops, the South Vietnamese infantry with inferior weapons (no anti-tank weapons, no 7th Fleet support) was able to defeat overwhelming commnist forces at the battle of An Loc (4/1972) and at the battle of Quang Tri (6/1972). South Vietnam was no less an outpost to contain communism than West Germany or South Korea, and certainly, these outposts must be maintained as long as U.S. values and interests are threatened, with or without U.S. troops. They are mandatory and indefinite expenses that must be budgeted into any nation's defense. Nowadays, even without the threat of a communist superpower, U.S. troops are still being deployed in Germany, South Korea, Japan, etc.... Yet, on her "brink" of victory, the abandonment of South Vietnam by the U.S. was inhumanly orchestrated. Why such a devastated and unconscionable treatment of an ally? When did this thought of disengagement start? The answer lies in the battle of Khe Sanh in 1968. After the Khe Sanh victory, U.S. strategists reveled in the discovery of their logistics superiority, even allied forces (U.S. Marines and ARVN paratroopers) were outnumbered by the Viet Cong who tried in vain to repeat Dien Bien Phu. The Khe Sanh battle destroyed the invincible myth of the Soviet bloc and Chinese war machine where its logistics showed the first signs of distress but Khe Sanh was never reinforced to become a strategic chokepoint of this war machine's logistics and infiltration. Instead, Khe Sanh was hastily abandoned and its victory was immediately downplayed into oblivion until 41 years later. Back home in the USSR, famine and long lines in front of collective food stores were rampant. Advancing its war machine into a couple more countries, Angola, Nicaragua, and Afghanistan, overreached USSR imploded. Khe Sanh now stands its place on the honor row with Concord, Gettysburg, and Normandie (Ref. Obama's 2009 inaugural speech) in the history of the U.S. but the Vietnam War was never declared as an astute, calculated tactic to achieve a strategic victory and destruction of the USSR. Let the uninformed parrot it a suffering defeat shuns the guilt of the nation.
VNExodus
A boat people
Vietnam War defeat shuns the guilt of the nation
Citing the battle of Lam Son 719 in 1971, at best hardly won by communist forces, and concluding the incapability of the South Vietnamese army to stand on its own is the quintessence of hollowness. This writing clearly betrays the formation quality and dishonors both the West Point academy and the University of Chicago. The author's ignorance in logistics is criminal. With nearly a million of SEATO troops involved, with the naval blockade and air raids by the 7th Fleet, by squadrons of B-52s, the U.S. could hardly convince the North communists to seat down in Paris and sign a perfunctory peace treaty that they immediately thrashed away. Yet with no significant involvment of U.S. troops, the South Vietnamese infantry with inferior weapons (no anti-tank weapons, no 7th Fleet support) was able to defeat overwhelming commnist forces at the battle of An Loc (4/1972) and at the battle of Quang Tri (6/1972). South Vietnam was no less an outpost to contain communism than West Germany or South Korea, and certainly, these outposts must be maintained as long as U.S. values and interests are threatened, with or without U.S. troops. They are mandatory and indefinite expenses that must be budgeted into any nation's defense. Nowadays, even without the threat of a communist superpower, U.S. troops are still being deployed in Germany, South Korea, Japan, etc.... Yet, on her "brink" of victory, the abandonment of South Vietnam by the U.S. was inhumanly orchestrated. Why such a devastated and unconscionable treatment of an ally? When did this thought of disengagement start? The answer lies in the battle of Khe Sanh in 1968. After the Khe Sanh victory, U.S. strategists reveled in the discovery of their logistics superiority, even allied forces (U.S. Marines and ARVN paratroopers) were outnumbered by the Viet Cong who tried in vain to repeat Dien Bien Phu. The Khe Sanh battle destroyed the invincible myth of the Soviet bloc and Chinese war machine where its logistics showed the first signs of distress but Khe Sanh was never reinforced to become a strategic chokepoint of this war machine's logistics and infiltration. Instead, Khe Sanh was hastily abandoned and its victory was immediately downplayed into oblivion until 41 years later. Back home in the USSR, famine and long lines in front of collective food stores were rampant. Advancing its war machine into a couple more countries, Angola, Nicaragua, and Afghanistan, overreached USSR imploded. Khe Sanh now stands its place on the honor row with Concord, Gettysburg, and Normandie (Ref. Obama's 2009 inaugural speech) in the history of the U.S. but the Vietnam War was never declared as an astute, calculated tactic to achieve a strategic victory and destruction of the USSR. Let the uninformed parrot it a suffering defeat shuns the guilt of the nation.
VNExodus
A boat people
Thursday, November 05, 2009
Not the giddiest pom-pom girl in Obamaland

It looks like our smart diplomacy of engagement with Iran continues working. They cracked down on dissidents. Their supreme leader particularly insulted us in a speech yesterday. They dither with us and insult us by rejecting our offers of uranium enrichment in our negotiations.
And now we discover this unbelievably large shipments of weapons intended for Hezbollah. Everybody understands what Hezbollah and Hamas are about. They are intent — self-declared — on destroying Israel and never accepting a settlement of any kind.
So this is about war, war-making [by] the proxies of Iran. Ultimately, these weapons are intended to attack Israeli cities and kill as much as possible.
And the Israelis have demonstrated this in the capture, hoping the world will do something. But of course, it will do nothing. Tomorrow at the United Nations, the Goldstone report condemning Israel's defensive action in Gaza earlier this year is going to essentially outlaw Israel's self-defense against terror attack.
That's how the world responds, and America now is engaged in useless negotiations over settlement freezes which are entirely irrelevant to this issue of Iran, Hezbollah or Hamas.
Wednesday, November 04, 2009
Tuesday, November 03, 2009
Sounds perfectly reasonable,
except the part about crucifixion after the beheading. Ahh, close enough.
Monday, November 02, 2009
Gutless Goppers Never Get Da Goil

Labels:
con artists,
Dumbos on Parade,
Raketenwissenschaft
Score Another for Islam.

As for the shameless hussy, did she really think she would get license in our brave new AmeriSoc to indulge in her offensive Islamophobia? Momo loves you, Biatch.
The 65th time is the toughest
Courageous chap. But he should have called an airstrike, instead of going the Rot route.
Rot to the big house!
“Until Tory’s death I texted while driving, as have most people. I don’t think she realized the danger she was causing.” Indeed, the victim herself had sent a text message and talked on her cellphone (using the speaker function) while driving before her car broke down.
Cosmic idiocy.
Cosmic idiocy.
Labels:
IT'S ALL ROT'S FAULT,
killer cell phones
Women talk. Ace translates.
This whole process is somewhat surreal; it's like watching one retard correct another retard on the correct pronunciation of "genre." Not to get all postmodern on you, but it's all very meta; one person with nothing to say but who thinks herself clever is deconstructing a very similar person with nothing to say but who thinks herself clever.
If Tina Brown's next column is about Maureen Dowd's last column, and then Wonkette deconstructs that column, I think the very fabric of the universe might begin to unravel due to the effects of a gravity-ripping singularity of ironic vapidity.
It's like masturbating to the thought of yourself masturbating. Sure, it's kind of fun to inject a little postmodern reiteration into onanism, but honestly, what's the point?
If Tina Brown's next column is about Maureen Dowd's last column, and then Wonkette deconstructs that column, I think the very fabric of the universe might begin to unravel due to the effects of a gravity-ripping singularity of ironic vapidity.
It's like masturbating to the thought of yourself masturbating. Sure, it's kind of fun to inject a little postmodern reiteration into onanism, but honestly, what's the point?
Sunday, November 01, 2009
The Little Bleu Book

[from the comment section on the VDH article Rot posted below]
27. Bob from Virginia:
You wrote “What is next? Green “yes, we can” scarves and tiny little Audacity of Hope books to wave at rallies?”
From Amazon
“Pocket Obama (Paperback)
This is the little blue book that right-wing partisans love to hate. Printed in a size that easily fits into pocket or purse, POCKET OBAMA is an anthology of quotations borrowed from Barack Obama’s speeches and writings, intended to keep the momentum going for those inspired by his message of hope and change. The portable book serves as a reminder of the remarkable ability of this man to move people with his words, a primer for readers who want to examine the substance of his thought and reflect on the next great chapter in the American story. His captivating oratory has earned comparisons to John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King, and this collection presents words that catapulted his remarkable rise to the American Presidency and set a true course for the future. Includes themes of democracy, politics, war, terrorism, race, community, jurisprudence, faith, personal responsibility, national identity, and above all, his hoped-for vision of a new America. POCKET OBAMA is essential reading as we pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off, and begin the work of remaking America.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)