10 euro-cents per share of that crappy airline? More than it's worth. I've flown on it a couple of times, and the service is abysmal. Maybe the French can improve things? Hard to believe. Just can't have a socialist-run airline, it's against Coanda-rules.
I am pleased that the government is getting out of the airline business. The unions would hold the whole country hostage through that damned golden share. I would rather BA had bought the thng, but it is more logical for AF to. AI, I have not flown AF ever. You? I hear it's terrible too. I do remember KLM as being the best ever though and Ali not as bad as NWA, and more about like BA.
I've flown Air France several times -- it's OK from what I recall. Food was good, got me there in one piece, didn't spill OJ on me (like Alitalia did), what else can I ask? The Krauts and the Dutch are the best, though. Actually, I also flew last year on Iberia, and was pleasantly surprised. I thought they'd be worse than Alitalia, but they were quite good.
I think Iberia is connected with BA so can't be all that bad. Your orange juice tragedy gets yawns from across the ocean, though. It's almost as boring as the Coanda-love thing.
Just can't have a socialist-run airline, it's against Coanda-rules. Ever compared service on "socialist" airlines to that of any "capitalist" US carrier ? Food ? Seatting space ? Look of the stewardesses ? Man, this is like shooting fish in a barrel.
Hey, I didn't say anything bad about Air France -- I'm actually relatively happy with them. I'm just pissed at Alitalia -- JJ knows all the gory details why, I can recapitulate them at length if there is enough popular demand for my horror story with Dagolines. Now, about US airlines -- they used to be pretty good in the old days (though edible food was never their forte). Nowadays, they suck, big time -- closer to Aeroflot when it comes to service, than to the Nanny State airlines, yes. Coanda weeps.
Good. Now does that tell us anything about a pure capitalist system as a model for all economic activity ? Is it possible that the public benefits from some measure of government intervention (I am not talking kolkose here) ?
I'm fine, as long as it's done within reason, and not in an ideological, non-pragmatic sort of way. And, it should be subject to revision: the danger with these nanny-state companies is that they become fossilized dinosaur, with everyone on the dole, and no one caring about service, competition, standards, etc. I don't say it can't be avoided (or that the free enterprise system does not have its own pitfalls), but the burden of proof is on the kolkhoz-like enterprise.
13 comments:
And it said Alitalia will maintain its national identity within the Air France-KLM group after the takeover, which could be completed by mid-2008.
How do you say "La marseillaise" in wop ?
i think it's vaffanculo, but am not sure
10 euro-cents per share of that crappy airline? More than it's worth. I've flown on it a couple of times, and the service is abysmal. Maybe the French can improve things? Hard to believe. Just can't have a socialist-run airline, it's against Coanda-rules.
I am pleased that the government is getting out of the airline business. The unions would hold the whole country hostage through that damned golden share. I would rather BA had bought the thng, but it is more logical for AF to.
AI, I have not flown AF ever. You? I hear it's terrible too. I do remember KLM as being the best ever though and Ali not as bad as NWA, and more about like BA.
I've flown Air France several times -- it's OK from what I recall. Food was good, got me there in one piece, didn't spill OJ on me (like Alitalia did), what else can I ask? The Krauts and the Dutch are the best, though. Actually, I also flew last year on Iberia, and was pleasantly surprised. I thought they'd be worse than Alitalia, but they were quite good.
I think Iberia is connected with BA so can't be all that bad. Your orange juice tragedy gets yawns from across the ocean, though. It's almost as boring as the Coanda-love thing.
Seethe, JJ, seethe.
Just can't have a socialist-run airline, it's against Coanda-rules.
Ever compared service on "socialist" airlines to that of any "capitalist" US carrier ? Food ? Seatting space ? Look of the stewardesses ? Man, this is like shooting fish in a barrel.
Hey, I didn't say anything bad about Air France -- I'm actually relatively happy with them. I'm just pissed at Alitalia -- JJ knows all the gory details why, I can recapitulate them at length if there is enough popular demand for my horror story with Dagolines. Now, about US airlines -- they used to be pretty good in the old days (though edible food was never their forte). Nowadays, they suck, big time -- closer to Aeroflot when it comes to service, than to the Nanny State airlines, yes. Coanda weeps.
Good. Now does that tell us anything about a pure capitalist system as a model for all economic activity ? Is it possible that the public benefits from some measure of government intervention (I am not talking kolkose here) ?
I'm fine, as long as it's done within reason, and not in an ideological, non-pragmatic sort of way. And, it should be subject to revision: the danger with these nanny-state companies is that they become fossilized dinosaur, with everyone on the dole, and no one caring about service, competition, standards, etc. I don't say it can't be avoided (or that the free enterprise system does not have its own pitfalls), but the burden of proof is on the kolkhoz-like enterprise.
I'm fine, as long as it's done within reason, and not in an ideological, non-pragmatic sort of way.
AI, someone stole your handle!
I'm fine, as long as it's done within reason, and not in an ideological, non-pragmatic sort of way.
AI, someone stole your handle!
Post a Comment