And the point, is, JJ? I say, a pox on all their houses. They have nothing to talk about, all these limo liberal pinko shysters, so they just froth at the mouth. Let them. I'm all for free speech, unlike some closet Torquemadas that I will not name. (see how I keep my mouth shut?)
BTW, why do they say this harridan is "one of the world's most beautiful women"? Looks like your typical vegan birkenstocker marching up and down with a "Ban the Bomb" sign, or something.
Calling Hillary Clinton a monster is "odious and offensive to monsters everywhere," said Tracy Klujian, the executive director of the Monster Anti-Defamation League. "As monsters, we are subject to defamation and stereotyping on a daily basis," Mr. Klujian said. "But being lumped together with Hillary Clinton is really a low blow."
The point is that Kurtz seems to see your point of view sort of. I still don't know what it is in you that doesn't understand that if your job is to speak, then you must speak right. And the right speak is determined by people's attitudes toward what you say. Also, that attitude might well depend on who you are. It is just obvious and if you don't like it, then you can forget about democracy.
9 comments:
And the point, is, JJ? I say, a pox on all their houses. They have nothing to talk about, all these limo liberal pinko shysters, so they just froth at the mouth. Let them. I'm all for free speech, unlike some closet Torquemadas that I will not name. (see how I keep my mouth shut?)
BTW, why do they say this harridan is "one of the world's most beautiful women"? Looks like your typical vegan birkenstocker marching up and down with a "Ban the Bomb" sign, or something.
Calling Hillary Clinton a monster is "odious and offensive to monsters everywhere," said Tracy Klujian, the executive director of the Monster Anti-Defamation League. "As monsters, we are subject to defamation and stereotyping on a daily basis," Mr. Klujian said. "But being lumped together with Hillary Clinton is really a low blow."
The point is that Kurtz seems to see your point of view sort of. I still don't know what it is in you that doesn't understand that if your job is to speak, then you must speak right. And the right speak is determined by people's attitudes toward what you say.
Also, that attitude might well depend on who you are.
It is just obvious and if you don't like it, then you can forget about democracy.
As far as beauty is concerned, I am with you. Men's Vogue must be a weird pub because women's Vogue knows a babe when they see one.
JJ, we need to fight this out a outrance. I responded in another post, but surely this can go on and on, like bbq, coanda, and cell phones.
In that case, I suggest it get its own label. I suggest A I Pelosi.
Why Pelosi? I'm just lost there...
Wasn't she one of the cackling chickens that said domestic wiretapping would have a chilling effect on freedom of speech?
Post a Comment