Bastards of the World, Genetics Shall set Ye Free! Go Forth and Multiply your Clobbering of the Good, ensure the Meek inherit their 12 square feet of Earth, for DNA's in your Heaven, and All's Right With The World.
Note: Born Bad Boys get all the Love.
Posts
13 comments:
An easy juxtaposition, as usual.
Back at you then, but this is really pathetic.
Easy Juxtaposition?? What, you think that roughly 250 million dead to earn those three their coveted height in the ranks of the Natural Born Killers was easy? A case of juxtapostion?
And how exactly is a picture of a group of NeoNazis doing their schtick "back at you"?? They were rallying for the US Constitution? For the abolition of slavery? For a division of government into spheres of limited power to frustrate those who would establish of tyranny? For that all men are born equal, with right to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness?
You got one thing right, what you wrote is really pathetic. So pathetic that one has to wonder if you even read the article or just fumed at the pictures of your heroes handled in so an unPepean fashion.
By the way, thanks for the link. It's another nice example of how those born Bad to the Bone just keep gettin' the Luv.
AA - you sound like the Berkeley-ites that ride around in their subarus with "yet another man against violence against women" / "just say no to racism" bumper stickers. Just because the argument is poor doesn't mean that we disagree on its object.
in this instance, you start with a sequence of uber-bad guys and finish with your favorite target: muslim (who are pro-hitlerian). What I am saying to you is I could use the same initial sequence and end with american neo-nazis instead of your favorite scapegoats. Get it?
Pepe, I don't know if it's so much a, in your words, a scapegoat, as the idea of Islam Militant being hardwired (through Mohammad ideology) toward a global theocracy. There are certainly large groups of individuals who call themselves Muslim and say they don't subscribe to this, but they don't understand the message at the core of the Quran. The Imams who tell them what's in the Quran do, and that's what is, to put it mildly, troubling.
I mentioned similar ideas concerning this in a post last weekend, evidence coming from the ideas of your compatriot, Michel Houellebecq in Platform, and Ayaan Hirsi Ali's take on her home of Somalia and such. I don't recall ever getting a response, though. No matter. We get busy.
It's good to be extremely hard on religion, especially the monotheistic sorts that tend toward totalitarianism, or theocracy. Being hard on religion and the sanction thereof (whether in the form of Mohommad or Disneyland) is inherent to the universal themes outlined in the Declaration of Independence, and the U.S. Constitution.
Scapegoats? Oh, I love that pinko term -- it's almost universally used by lefties, in precisely this kind of context. Pepe, you really do sound like an apparatchick, lecturing from the little red book verities handed down from on high. You ever try thinking for yourself, for a change? It can be refreshing, you know.
How about this, just for fun? Where's planet Pepe when you need it?
"AA - you sound like the Berkeley-ites that ride around in their subarus with "yet another man against violence against women" / "just say no to racism" bumper stickers. Just because the argument is poor doesn't mean that we disagree on its object.
in this instance, you start with a sequence of uber-bad guys and finish with your favorite target: muslim (who are pro-hitlerian). What I am saying to you is I could use the same initial sequence and end with american neo-nazis instead of your favorite scapegoats. Get it?"
Yeah, you really were being as obtuse, whether by intention or not you tell me, as seemed on first impression.
First, there is no hint that you read the article. It seems that you think the ardoning photos were "the argument". Nope, they were adornment. The original photo being the top one, as illustration of the article's subject, and then the bottom three ribbing those who today go around just Lovin' these as all getout.
Second, "Berkeleyite"? Don't invite me into your Sick House of Mirth, Punicello.
Third, You sure could have ended up with a third photo being that group of NeoNazis. It would have been boring and less illuminating of just where Luv for Bad Daddy comes from, after all we'd expect neonazis to be kinda like Nazi's, ya know, but it would have done just fine in illustrating the point. Had you posted the article, and chosen such photos, wouldn't have bothered me at all. But then I don't see NeoNazis as my allies against those who are enemies of what I cherish, they being in fact one of the enemies.
But Islam Militant can rely on you to "get it". Fo sho.
Second, "Berkeleyite"? Don't invite me into your Sick House of Mirth, Punicello.
You crashed the party.
Sorry - I somehow didn't see there was an article.
Sigh....
Ok, Pepe, the article was crucial to the whole thing.
As a rule of thumb, if the photos are the point I will have a comment, if any, on the photos themselves.
If I've a comment on something not in the photos, such as genetics and DNA, etc..., then an article is there at the link.
Goodnight, and until later.
AA
Doesn't the preponderance of a genetic component contribute to some extent to exonerate the behavior?
??
is there another thinking organ in the human body?
There is, but on Planet Pepe it's so very superfluous.
Post a Comment