The charge, amplified by Bill O'Reilly on Fox News in April and reverberating around the conservative blogosphere, is about the most damning allegation that can be made against a news organization. If true, it would mean that Times editors, whose job is to report the facts without fear or favor, were so lacking in integrity that they withheld an important story in order to influence the election. Duhhh. Of course the NYT spiked the ACORN story, so as to push for their favorite candidate. I mean, if this is not totally self-evident, what is?
2 comments:
The charge, amplified by Bill O'Reilly on Fox News in April and reverberating around the conservative blogosphere, is about the most damning allegation that can be made against a news organization. If true, it would mean that Times editors, whose job is to report the facts without fear or favor, were so lacking in integrity that they withheld an important story in order to influence the election.
Duhhh. Of course the NYT spiked the ACORN story, so as to push for their favorite candidate. I mean, if this is not totally self-evident, what is?
One more election and we're done with them?
Post a Comment