"It's amusing hearing a conservative complain about liberals and the constitution....it seems that when a judge says something is unconstitutional, the conservatives scream "activist judge", yet when a judge infers things that are not written, then they are "doing their duty". Look at the way the conservative supreme court has ruled on issues the past 10 yrs, look at the federal courts that ruled on health care...so far, it's 2 judges ruling the health care law is constitutional to one judge that says it isn't."
"It's amusing to read yet another Pomo Leftist complain about those who would uphold the constitution. It is amusing exactly one time. Then boredom overpowers as the "argument" set forth happens to be the same step by step each and every time: [1] Take things written in the constitution and note that Conservatives care about those written things. [2] Claim the exact opposite and trust Conservatives to be as indifferent to the text as Pomo Leftists are. [3] Note that Pomo Leftist judges decide what is to be called constitutional, or unconstitutiional, without being burdened by actually having to read, never mind consider, those silly old words actually written down in the Constitution. [4] Claim the exact opposite and trust Conservatives to be as indifferent to the text as Pomo Leftists are. [4] Reiterate this 4-step hip-hop until Soros apologizes for the murders of those Jews he fingered to the Gestapo in Hungary in WWII, or Global Warming melts Antarctica, whichever Leftist version of Hell Freezing Over comes first."
9 comments:
Point and Counterpoint:
"It's amusing hearing a conservative complain about liberals and the constitution....it seems that when a judge says something is unconstitutional, the conservatives scream "activist judge", yet when a judge infers things that are not written, then they are "doing their duty". Look at the way the conservative supreme court has ruled on issues the past 10 yrs, look at the federal courts that ruled on health care...so far, it's 2 judges ruling the health care law is constitutional to one judge that says it isn't."
"It's amusing to read yet another Pomo Leftist complain about those who would uphold the constitution. It is amusing exactly one time. Then boredom overpowers as the "argument" set forth happens to be the same step by step each and every time: [1] Take things written in the constitution and note that Conservatives care about those written things. [2] Claim the exact opposite and trust Conservatives to be as indifferent to the text as Pomo Leftists are. [3] Note that Pomo Leftist judges decide what is to be called constitutional, or unconstitutiional, without being burdened by actually having to read, never mind consider, those silly old words actually written down in the Constitution. [4] Claim the exact opposite and trust Conservatives to be as indifferent to the text as Pomo Leftists are.
[4] Reiterate this 4-step hip-hop until Soros apologizes for the murders of those Jews he fingered to the Gestapo in Hungary in WWII, or Global Warming melts Antarctica, whichever Leftist version of Hell Freezing Over comes first."
Shouldn't that be "Pepe's personal hygiene takes a nosedive"?
Rot is getting old and confused. That's all.
Oh, duhh. This passes for insight, Herr Rot? Try harder, willya?
You were reading the guy religiously when you found out he went to Yale, right?
Who went to Yale? Little Ezra? No way, José.
JournoList = Ivy. Duh. Pay up.
How can JournoList equal Ivy? The equal sign should mean something, like, er, equality. At least in non-Rotter Logick.
Define "moral equality" first. Is that a sort of \lesssim?
Post a Comment