Friday, December 31, 2010

The wisdom of slamming McCain

...explained to Tecs and AA.
Posted by at
Labels:

15 comments:

Tecumseh said...

Yeah, yeah, yeah. As if McCain ever made a real effort to win the election.

Now, what were we talking about? Ah, the social-democratization of the US. Small potatoes, by comparison.

12/31/2010 7:39 AM
Arelcao Akleos said...

No one did as good a job of slamming and undermining Ol' McCain as Sen. John McCain. The fucker willed his defeat, and spent far more energy dissing the Alaskan biatch who brought hope into his "campaign" than he ever did that array of Pepeanic Merde that coalesced around Obamakles.
The question is, are the Repubs going to go whole seppuku on us and slap another pissant variant of McCain, or Dole, or Bush Pere, or Bush Fils 2nd Term? I've got my stocks of whisky, and a primed shotgun, at the ready. So much for confidence in this Republic.

1/01/2011 10:41 AM
Mr roT said...

The GOP is Scott Brown and Jim DeMint.

Tecs pulls for Scottie.

1/01/2011 10:43 AM
Tecumseh said...

Well, I did when he ran against Coackley. Of course, you were pulling hard for the hag at the time. So OK, now he's just another RINO. Still better than Coackley.

As for the second point, there's much more to the GOP than Scottie and deMint. Just wait for Monday, when new Congress starts. And don't forget dem Guvs. I thought you liked Christie, no?

1/01/2011 10:47 AM
Mr roT said...

Christie is morally equivalent to DeMint.

1/01/2011 10:51 AM
Tecumseh said...

But, eg, Christie supported Castle, whereas deMint famously pulled for O'Donnell. Yet another Rotter quasi-equality?

1/01/2011 10:52 AM
Mr roT said...

Incidentally, Tecs, it's Jim DeMint, not Jim de Mint as if he were some pinky-up pinko slurpin on rodent ulnæ in Nancy.

1/01/2011 10:53 AM
Tecumseh said...

DeMint=deMint is a much closer equality than DeMint=Christie. Of course, Rotter Logick cannot grasp the concept.

1/01/2011 10:59 AM
Mr roT said...

Christie pulled for Coakley?

Jeez, Tecs, you're confused. Maybe a diagram would help.

1/01/2011 11:00 AM
Mr roT said...

I meant Cloacally. Marshy Cloacally.

1/01/2011 11:01 AM
Mr roT said...

A closer equality!

1/01/2011 11:02 AM
Tecumseh said...

Just trying to explain things within Rotter Calculus, wherein = don't mean =, but rather, some kind of undefined approximation (or, \lesssim, as he calls it). If you accept that kind of Fuzzy Logick (and you evidently do), then it makes sense to talk about weaker or stronger equality, I'd say.

But you're the expert at your own Logick, so enlighten us on its more rarefied aspects.

1/01/2011 11:09 AM
Mr roT said...

First pay up. Lessons come after Die Rechnung bezahlt ist.

1/01/2011 11:48 AM
Tecumseh said...

Where would that big settlement occur? We were supposed to meet in 2010 in Euroland, but noooo, said Rot, it's too much of a detour to go from one dinky city to another by train. Maybe in 2011?

1/01/2011 2:06 PM
Mr roT said...

Hope so, but we need a solid agreement on die Rechnung....

1/01/2011 2:37 PM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)