Saturday, August 27, 2011
Once upon a time, Mr Rot used to just love David Brooks
Former Democrat? Yeah, so are most Texas Republicans. Supported Gore? That’s way back when Gore was sane. Sounds like Rotter's alter ego.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
26 comments:
Still pulling down the GOP front-runner so that a Demtard can win, eh, Tecs?
How's that hopey-changey thing workin out for ya?
You're evading the question implicit in my title: you still love David Brooks, the way you were lecturing us a decade or so ago on his wisdom and style?
Isn't he a U Chicagotard?
More your cup o tea, methinks, like SCROTUS.
Incidentally, you haven't writhed appropriately about Peggy Noonan's new admiration of the crease or whatever.
It's about temperament, Tecs!
Brooks admired the crease in the pants. Peggy admired whatevah.
OK, OK. That was then and this is now. So how do you explain the Establishment's reaction to Perry?
Please, tell me even you guys can't stand Perry.
Yeah, Rotter has Loved Brooks longtime. When Brooks and McLellan and Graham and Tucker Carlson form their fab quartet, the Rotter dreams his dream.
Then when it gets Frum-ious, Herr Rott quite loses his bandersnatch.
Please, tell me even you can't stand Obama.
AA still steamed about his genius dream ticket Kerry-McCain going nowhere.
Poor Le Pew. Prancing around Paree and still the Texas rubes muck up the Pepe Gay.
Nope, still steamed about the Pepe Dream Ticket going on year four of destroying this country...while Herr Rott scours Newport for all those admirable cut of jibs he can't get enough of.
Hah! I wouldn't set foot in Newport!
You'd just swill the champagne on your yacht by Chez Bourgnin.
There's a vinho verde bong on board...
roT -> I can't either.
AA -> relax, I didn't vote. whodat bourgnin ?
Pepe, you were all for Obama before you were against him...
McCain and Palin would not have wrecked the economy further by pushing for more regs and some bullshit socialized medicine in the early parts of a severe recession.
That takes a special breed of self-assured fucktard that only affirmative action can produce.
You've got low expectations for Mac, eh? Of course, 0>x, for any x negative, but that's kind of meaningless, no?
Apparently not to 53% of the US electorate.
The problem is not Obama. It's feel-good retards that thought it would be cool to atone for slavery by making the world safe for tyrants.
Somehow, that flew. Hitchens brought up Lady Diana....
Water under the bridge. Why obsess over Mac's pathetic 2008 campaign (which, of course, you thought was brilliant at the time)? I say, let's learn from past mistakes, and focus on the future. I mean, duh.
Right. Romney/Perry. They can win.
How to fit Rubio into the equation? Kraut says that, at the very least, Rubio should give the keynote address at the Convention (the way O did it in 2004).
BTW, I like Rubio's English better than either Palin's or Perry's. It's much more mellifluous. That counts for something with me.
OK, OK, I got the point. Though Rubio was Speaker of the Floriduh House before being elected to the Senate, which is not complete chickenshit (better than Mayor of Wasilla, for sure, mais passons.)
So, will you settle for keynote speaker at the convention, then? C'mon, be a sport, Herr Rot. Give the young man a chance to prove himself.
Romney perhaps but what is attractive about perry besides the political blow job to evangelical radio addicts and mulleted pat boone listeners?
...if only he could speak meaningfully about Hope and Change, eh?
Or does he have to know crap about Rothko too?
I didn't think you would come up with a rational either.
Check out Rothko's early work, particularly in the NY underground.
Post a Comment