A. K. A. Loose Canon
McCain’s behaviour endears him with the liberal-left mainstream media as a maverick, while conservatives find him increasingly unworthy of respect. American conservatives are not simply bitter about the 2008 election results, they hold McCain responsible for refusing to vet the questionable record of candidate Obama during the campaign. Duh. Of course, it's Rot's fault. Without a doubt. The man most responsible for digging deep and connecting the dots surrounding the Huma Abedin flap is Andrew McCarthy.Of course, he's the prime Enemy of Planet Rot. Why? Just connect the dots.
I've never understood Herr Rott's disdain for Andrew McCarthy. Ever since the Sheik Rahman case, after the first World Trade Center attack, Andrew has been consistently the sharpest and most thorough of the investigators on Jihad in the USA. At least that we have writing for the public. He has been proven right in his assertions and predictions over and over again. Yet Herr Rott would rather buy the Huma line? Methinks he pays too much for what he would buy from her.
I do not dispute that McCarthy is correct. He undoubtedly is. My problem with him is that he incontinently seethes rather than arguing calmly and rationally and presenting his evidence in a detached way. One can say that the acceleration of an object is proportional to the force applied to it and inversely proportional to its mass without frothing at the mouth and Newton's second law of motion is a lot more important than Huma Abedin. Obama let her into his administration and so she is a political football. If she weren't in Obama's circle, I would oppose Obama just as much. It is probable that Obama, which has power, hates the United States more than even Abedin, so why do we or McCarthy care about that little, unattractive rag? I think that she makes the news because she's prettier than Hillary and she's on the same news beat.
"I do not dispute that McCarthy is correct. He undoubtedly is. My problem with him is that he incontinently seethes rather than arguing calmly and rationally and presenting his evidence in a detached way." Your error Herr Rott ["error" as in making a claim as to the nature of things which just ain't so] is in the timing of seething and arguing. Andrew McCarthy does argue calmly, and very rationally, and presents evidence in a detached, comprehensive, powerfully accumulating way. His seething came later, after all that careful argumentation and compilation of evidence was blithely ignored in the name of embracing "Islam is Peace" or "The Saudis are Ever our Friends" or "Islam Militant is our Useful Ally" or "I Likes the Money they give me"--or whichever line was put out by whatever faction of the West that just doesn't want to have to come to grips with the implications of what Andrew McCarthy has been undoubtedly right about.
Huma Abedin does not make the newsbeat of the MSM, except to occasionally fawn over her. She definitely does make the newsbeat of the non-MSM because she is long member of proud Islam Militant who happens to be the top aide to our Secretary of State and former First Lady. Ain't got shit to do about her looks, except perhaps for providing a reason for Hillary to gaze upon her with adoration. She is not just a symbol, but a powerful example, of how the Washington establishment has been cooped, and penetrated by, Islam Militant. A Saudirian candidate, as is Obama, could not do nearly as much damage without a robust 5th column thriving in the Capitol. Hillary once set out to be his rational rival in things of foreign policy, and now I do not think we can distinguish between what she would do and what Huma would do.
The establishment GOP is just as bad as the Dems on this. That shit deserves its own look.
Andrew McCarthy does argue calmly, and very rationally, and presents evidence in a detached, comprehensive, powerfully accumulating way.Spoken by a continent man like you, AA, I think it wise for the cops to sequester firearms and sharp objects when you take Andy as your model and try to convince someone of something obvious that he doesn't even disagree with at the beginning of your "witnessing".I will supply the police with a good SOP: They should start their operation when the Foam of Reason appears at your mouth.
Now that's the sort of "Reason" Andrew has to contend with. Herr Rott has his Postulates, all Parallel in the Euclidean rut, and to question them is to Foam. Even worse, to be a McCarthy'ite. Sorry, Andy, Amos just don't care.
Post a Comment