Tuesday, February 03, 2009

Obamakles Contra Petraeus


Well, of course. Who is Petraeus to think he has the right to deny The One the chance to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory?

7 comments:

Mr roT said...

Democrat pre-cum.

One can only hope (Hope) that Obama's going on al-Arabiya with his kneepads on and now making an unholy clusterfuck of the nominations will weaken him and Gates et al. will win the day.

Of course, you and Tecs pulling for Obama when McCain was for the Surge pretty much are responsible for our predicament.

A great job.

Tecumseh said...

Mr Rot: Non sequitur et omnia non sequitur. Your excursion in Pepean logic is a non-starter.

That said, yes, it's a pinko specialty to snatch defeat out of the jaws of victory. It's part of he definition of being a pinko.

Mr roT said...

Our pinko in chief did a pretty good job of winning election from a bunch of milksoppian voters.

Tecumseh said...

Every rule has an exception. Yep, pinkos are pretty good at winning elections -- otherwise, they'd go out of business. You gotta think dialectically, Rot: one step forward, two steps backwards, sez Ilich.

Mr roT said...

Speaking of which, it seems Mnëv should have provided a counterexample if the difficulty in the proof is so dumb. What gives?

Arelcao Akleos said...

Mnev was hoping you'd not ask that question. Now he will call it dumber.

Tecumseh said...

Go back to Russia.