Yes, there was, AA. Your claim was that a Kerry-McCain ticket would be better than Bush-Cheney redux. Now that Petraeus is in charge and we can go on to new medical science without cutting up our kids on our behalf, it seems that there was no need to endure Kerry's presidential bloviations for (at least and at most) 4 years.
8 comments:
Kraut the Hammer lays it out very well. Now, what are the chances that the Squire of Louisbourg Square will eat crow? Don't forget the ketchup.
Will anyone pay up on the bets?
I'm curious, JJ, what are these bets you're referring to? Was there some sort of secret wager on the progress of stem cell biotechnology?
Yes, there was, AA. Your claim was that a Kerry-McCain ticket would be better than Bush-Cheney redux. Now that Petraeus is in charge and we can go on to new medical science without cutting up our kids on our behalf, it seems that there was no need to endure Kerry's presidential bloviations for (at least and at most) 4 years.
Are those (\ge & \le), or (> & <)?
Hmmm, so JJ is saying that McCain in charge of the "WOT" implies stem cell technology would stagnate? That was the wager?
Impenetrable are the ways of JJ.
Everyone outta my butt! I be impenetrable!
Post a Comment